PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFEIX vs. MCSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFEIX vs. MCSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Growth I (MFEIX) and MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFEIX achieves a 4.78% return, which is significantly lower than MCSIX's 15.47% return. Over the past 10 years, MFEIX has outperformed MCSIX with an annualized return of 17.27%, while MCSIX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.49% annualized return.


MFEIX

1D
0.66%
1M
2.46%
6M
3.32%
YTD
4.78%
1Y
9.75%
3Y*
24.98%
5Y*
12.05%
10Y*
17.27%

MCSIX

1D
-0.24%
1M
-2.79%
6M
10.58%
YTD
15.47%
1Y
26.14%
3Y*
13.04%
5Y*
10.10%
10Y*
6.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFEIX vs. MCSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFEIX
MFS Growth I
4.78%12.34%49.67%36.15%-31.14%23.59%31.65%37.69%2.30%30.86%
MCSIX
MFS Commodity Strategy Fund
15.47%18.47%5.08%-6.13%13.40%27.55%-0.02%7.79%-12.79%3.65%

Correlation

The correlation between MFEIX and MCSIX is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2010

0.19

The correlation between MFEIX and MCSIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFEIX vs. MCSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFEIX
MFEIX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
MFEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
MFEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

MCSIX
MCSIX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
MCSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
MCSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFEIX vs. MCSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Growth I (MFEIX) and MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MFEIXMCSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.31

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.54

2.15

-1.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.72

7.33

-5.61

MFEIX vs. MCSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFEIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the MCSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFEIX and MCSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MFEIX vs. MCSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFEIX drawdown since its inception was -72.24%, which is greater than MCSIX's maximum drawdown of -64.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFEIX and MCSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFEIXMCSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.24%

-64.20%

-8.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.30%

-12.69%

-4.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.24%

-12.69%

-10.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.11%

-37.61%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.11%

-37.61%

+1.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.76%

-10.11%

+8.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.66%

-33.12%

+9.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.44%

3.71%

+1.73%

Volatility

MFEIX vs. MCSIX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Growth I (MFEIX) has a higher volatility of 6.45% compared to MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSIX) at 3.92%. This indicates that MFEIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFEIXMCSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.45%

3.92%

+2.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.75%

13.34%

+0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.99%

16.01%

+0.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.09%

34.61%

-12.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.30%

26.01%

-4.71%

MFEIX vs. MCSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFEIX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than MCSIX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFEIX vs. MCSIX - Dividend Comparison

MFEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.31%, more than MCSIX's 13.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MCSIX
MFS Commodity Strategy Fund
13.89%16.04%3.30%2.21%27.42%56.01%0.88%1.87%3.50%3.14%0.61%0.47%
MFEIX
MFS Growth I
14.31%14.99%25.47%4.86%1.05%2.76%3.57%1.57%3.78%2.50%1.61%3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFEIX and MCSIX have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFEIX has higher volatility (6.45%) compared to MCSIX (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFEIX dropped -72.24% vs MCSIX's -64.20%.

MCSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFEIX and MCSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer