PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFAIX vs. TRBCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFAIX vs. TRBCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. International Advantage Portfolio (MFAIX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFAIX achieves a 1.58% return, which is significantly lower than TRBCX's 5.48% return. Over the past 10 years, MFAIX has underperformed TRBCX with an annualized return of 10.23%, while TRBCX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.69% annualized return.


MFAIX

1D
-0.11%
1M
5.89%
YTD
1.58%
6M
1.77%
1Y
3.22%
3Y*
8.00%
5Y*
0.24%
10Y*
10.23%

TRBCX

1D
-0.69%
1M
5.17%
YTD
5.48%
6M
5.64%
1Y
22.08%
3Y*
28.80%
5Y*
13.81%
10Y*
17.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFAIX vs. TRBCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFAIX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. International Advantage Portfolio
1.58%15.74%6.95%18.38%-34.47%13.14%32.33%30.27%-5.21%44.78%
TRBCX
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund
5.48%18.78%48.46%49.42%-38.57%17.54%34.73%29.97%2.00%36.54%

Correlation

The correlation between MFAIX and TRBCX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2010

0.72

The correlation between MFAIX and TRBCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFAIX vs. TRBCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFAIX
MFAIX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
MFAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
MFAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

TRBCX
TRBCX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
TRBCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRBCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRBCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
TRBCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRBCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFAIX vs. TRBCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. International Advantage Portfolio (MFAIX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MFAIXTRBCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.25

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.17

1.34

-1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.57

4.54

-3.97

MFAIX vs. TRBCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFAIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the TRBCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFAIX and TRBCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MFAIXTRBCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

1.37

-1.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

0.58

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.78

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.60

-0.07

Drawdowns

MFAIX vs. TRBCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFAIX drawdown since its inception was -47.98%, smaller than the maximum TRBCX drawdown of -54.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFAIX and TRBCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFAIXTRBCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.98%

-54.56%

+6.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.56%

-17.01%

+1.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.07%

-23.08%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.98%

-43.63%

-4.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.98%

-43.63%

-4.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.21%

-0.69%

-7.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.17%

-11.31%

+2.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.74%

5.01%

-0.27%

Volatility

MFAIX vs. TRBCX - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. International Advantage Portfolio (MFAIX) has a higher volatility of 6.01% compared to T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX) at 3.57%. This indicates that MFAIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRBCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFAIXTRBCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.01%

3.57%

+2.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.63%

13.37%

+1.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.06%

16.66%

+1.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.76%

24.03%

-2.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.34%

22.79%

-3.45%

MFAIX vs. TRBCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFAIX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than TRBCX's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFAIX vs. TRBCX - Dividend Comparison

MFAIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRBCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MFAIX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. International Advantage Portfolio
0.00%0.00%0.14%0.05%4.55%0.99%0.04%0.26%1.75%2.03%1.67%15.04%
TRBCX
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund
4.97%5.25%18.16%3.49%5.87%9.38%1.19%0.36%2.44%2.94%0.67%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFAIX and TRBCX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFAIX has higher volatility (6.01%) compared to TRBCX (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFAIX dropped -47.98% vs TRBCX's -54.56%.

TRBCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFAIX and TRBCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer