PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEUD.L vs. SX5S.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MEUD.L vs. SX5S.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L) and Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (SX5S.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MEUD.L having a 6.58% return and SX5S.L slightly lower at 6.46%. Over the past 10 years, MEUD.L has underperformed SX5S.L with an annualized return of 10.28%, while SX5S.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.41% annualized return.


MEUD.L

1D
0.58%
1M
3.26%
YTD
6.58%
6M
8.93%
1Y
19.54%
3Y*
14.05%
5Y*
9.89%
10Y*
10.28%

SX5S.L

1D
0.35%
1M
4.85%
YTD
6.46%
6M
7.51%
1Y
18.61%
3Y*
15.51%
5Y*
11.51%
10Y*
11.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEUD.L vs. SX5S.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MEUD.L
Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc
6.58%26.51%3.65%13.48%-5.04%17.06%3.85%20.40%-9.59%15.43%
SX5S.L
Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF
6.46%27.68%6.13%19.91%-3.67%14.48%2.12%23.51%-10.62%14.35%

Correlation

The correlation between MEUD.L and SX5S.L is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2014

0.79

The correlation between MEUD.L and SX5S.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (all time) to 0.93 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MEUD.L vs. SX5S.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MEUD.L
SX5S.L

Financial Services

24.0%
25.1%

Industrials

20.1%
22.1%

Healthcare

12.7%
5.4%

Technology

9.4%
16.1%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
5.5%

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%
9.8%

Energy

5.5%
5.2%

Basic Materials

5.0%
3.7%

Utilities

4.5%
4.8%

Communication Services

3.1%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.2%

-

Financial Services

MEUD.L
24.0%
SX5S.L
25.1%

Industrials

MEUD.L
20.1%
SX5S.L
22.1%

Healthcare

MEUD.L
12.7%
SX5S.L
5.4%

Technology

MEUD.L
9.4%
SX5S.L
16.1%

Consumer Defensive

MEUD.L
7.7%
SX5S.L
5.5%

Consumer Cyclical

MEUD.L
6.9%
SX5S.L
9.8%

Energy

MEUD.L
5.5%
SX5S.L
5.2%

Basic Materials

MEUD.L
5.0%
SX5S.L
3.7%

Utilities

MEUD.L
4.5%
SX5S.L
4.8%

Communication Services

MEUD.L
3.1%
SX5S.L
2.3%

Real Estate

MEUD.L
1.2%
SX5S.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MEUD.L vs. SX5S.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEUD.L
MEUD.L Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
MEUD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEUD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEUD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
MEUD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEUD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

SX5S.L
SX5S.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
SX5S.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SX5S.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
SX5S.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
SX5S.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
SX5S.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEUD.L vs. SX5S.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L) and Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (SX5S.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MEUD.LSX5S.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.23

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

1.62

+0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.70

5.40

+1.29

MEUD.L vs. SX5S.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEUD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is higher than the SX5S.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEUD.L and SX5S.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MEUD.LSX5S.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

1.23

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.69

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.73

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.59

+0.01

Drawdowns

MEUD.L vs. SX5S.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEUD.L drawdown since its inception was -28.57%, smaller than the maximum SX5S.L drawdown of -32.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEUD.L and SX5S.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MEUD.LSX5S.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.57%

-32.54%

+3.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.53%

-11.43%

+0.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.61%

-13.85%

+1.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.09%

-21.71%

+4.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.57%

-32.54%

+3.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

-0.57%

-0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.16%

-5.44%

+1.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

3.44%

-0.53%

Volatility

MEUD.L vs. SX5S.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L) is 4.14%, while Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (SX5S.L) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that MEUD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SX5S.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MEUD.LSX5S.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.14%

4.90%

-0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.20%

12.23%

-2.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.14%

15.09%

-2.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.94%

17.62%

-3.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.92%

19.88%

-4.96%

MEUD.L vs. SX5S.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEUD.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SX5S.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MEUD.L vs. SX5S.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MEUD.L nor SX5S.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, MEUD.L and SX5S.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SX5S.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SX5S.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MEUD.L.

MEUD.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while SX5S.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MEUD.L and 0.05% for SX5S.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MEUD.L and SX5S.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer