PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEUD.L vs. PR1T.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MEUD.L vs. PR1T.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L) and Amundi Prime US Treasury Bond 0-1 Y UCITS ETF DR USD (C) (PR1T.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MEUD.L is traded in GBp, while PR1T.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PR1T.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEUD.L achieves a 6.58% return, which is significantly higher than PR1T.L's 1.87% return.


MEUD.L

1D
0.58%
1M
3.26%
YTD
6.58%
6M
8.93%
1Y
19.54%
3Y*
14.05%
5Y*
9.89%
10Y*
10.28%

PR1T.L

1D
0.06%
1M
1.20%
YTD
1.87%
6M
1.05%
1Y
4.95%
3Y*
2.03%
5Y*
4.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEUD.L vs. PR1T.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MEUD.L
Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc
6.58%26.51%3.65%13.48%-5.04%17.06%9.40%
PR1T.L
Amundi Prime US Treasury Bond 0-1 Y UCITS ETF DR USD (C)
1.87%-3.21%7.04%-0.41%12.57%1.04%-6.84%

Correlation

The correlation between MEUD.L and PR1T.L is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2020

-0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MEUD.L vs. PR1T.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEUD.L
MEUD.L Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
MEUD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEUD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEUD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
MEUD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEUD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

PR1T.L
PR1T.L Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
PR1T.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PR1T.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
PR1T.L Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
PR1T.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
PR1T.L Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEUD.L vs. PR1T.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L) and Amundi Prime US Treasury Bond 0-1 Y UCITS ETF DR USD (C) (PR1T.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MEUD.LPR1T.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.13

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

0.96

+0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.70

2.61

+4.09

MEUD.L vs. PR1T.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEUD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is higher than the PR1T.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEUD.L and PR1T.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MEUD.LPR1T.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

0.75

+0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.52

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.23

+0.37

Drawdowns

MEUD.L vs. PR1T.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEUD.L drawdown since its inception was -28.57%, which is greater than PR1T.L's maximum drawdown of -16.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEUD.L and PR1T.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MEUD.LPR1T.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.57%

-16.09%

-12.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.53%

-5.15%

-5.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.61%

-9.86%

-2.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.09%

-16.09%

-1.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

-6.37%

+5.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.16%

-7.80%

+3.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

1.89%

+1.02%

Volatility

MEUD.L vs. PR1T.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L) has a higher volatility of 4.14% compared to Amundi Prime US Treasury Bond 0-1 Y UCITS ETF DR USD (C) (PR1T.L) at 1.76%. This indicates that MEUD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PR1T.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MEUD.LPR1T.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.14%

1.76%

+2.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.20%

4.96%

+5.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.14%

6.58%

+5.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.94%

8.46%

+5.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.92%

8.34%

+6.58%

MEUD.L vs. PR1T.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEUD.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than PR1T.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MEUD.L vs. PR1T.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MEUD.L nor PR1T.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MEUD.L and PR1T.L have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PR1T.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PR1T.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MEUD.L.

MEUD.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while PR1T.L is Government Bonds. MEUD.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while PR1T.L tracks Solactive US Treasury 0-1 Year Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MEUD.L and 0.05% for PR1T.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MEUD.L and PR1T.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer