MEUD.L vs. LCPE.L
MEUD.L (Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc) and LCPE.L (Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS) are both Europe Equities funds tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR, from Amundi and Natixis respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MEUD.L returned 10.28%/yr vs 10.16%/yr for LCPE.L. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MEUD.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LCPE.L.
Performance
MEUD.L vs. LCPE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MEUD.L achieves a 6.58% return, which is significantly lower than LCPE.L's 14.20% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MEUD.L having a 10.28% annualized return and LCPE.L not far behind at 10.16%.
MEUD.L
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 3.26%
- YTD
- 6.58%
- 6M
- 8.93%
- 1Y
- 19.54%
- 3Y*
- 14.05%
- 5Y*
- 9.89%
- 10Y*
- 10.28%
LCPE.L
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 3.01%
- YTD
- 14.20%
- 6M
- 14.45%
- 1Y
- 27.63%
- 3Y*
- 11.83%
- 5Y*
- 9.64%
- 10Y*
- 10.16%
MEUD.L vs. LCPE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEUD.L Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc | 6.58% | 26.51% | 3.65% | 13.48% | -5.04% | 17.06% | 3.85% | 20.40% | -9.59% | 15.43% |
LCPE.L Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS | 14.20% | 18.88% | -2.83% | 10.70% | 0.29% | 16.28% | 8.38% | 12.94% | -2.26% | 9.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between MEUD.L and LCPE.L is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2015 | 0.41 |
Over the past year, MEUD.L and LCPE.L have become more correlated (0.69) than their long-term average of 0.41, meaning their price movements have been converging.
MEUD.L vs. LCPE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MEUD.L
LCPE.L
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
MEUD.L
LCPE.L
-
Industrials
MEUD.L
LCPE.L
Healthcare
MEUD.L
LCPE.L
Technology
MEUD.L
LCPE.L
Consumer Defensive
MEUD.L
LCPE.L
Consumer Cyclical
MEUD.L
LCPE.L
Energy
MEUD.L
LCPE.L
Basic Materials
MEUD.L
LCPE.L
Utilities
MEUD.L
LCPE.L
-
Communication Services
MEUD.L
LCPE.L
Real Estate
MEUD.L
LCPE.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MEUD.L vs. LCPE.L — Risk / Return Rank
MEUD.L
LCPE.L
MEUD.L vs. LCPE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MEUD.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.43 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 4.13 | -2.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.70 | 13.66 | -6.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MEUD.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.60 | 2.44 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 1.04 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 1.20 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.98 | -0.39 |
Drawdowns
MEUD.L vs. LCPE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MEUD.L drawdown since its inception was -28.57%, which is greater than LCPE.L's maximum drawdown of -27.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEUD.L and LCPE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MEUD.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.57% | -27.05% | -1.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.53% | -6.66% | -3.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.61% | -12.39% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.09% | -12.39% | -4.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.57% | -27.05% | -1.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.33% | -2.71% | +1.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.16% | -3.52% | -0.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 2.02% | +0.89% |
Volatility
MEUD.L vs. LCPE.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L) has a higher volatility of 4.14% compared to Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) at 3.81%. This indicates that MEUD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCPE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MEUD.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.14% | 3.81% | +0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.20% | 8.48% | +1.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.14% | 11.29% | +0.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.94% | 17.74% | -3.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.92% | 20.60% | -5.68% |
MEUD.L vs. LCPE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MEUD.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than LCPE.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
MEUD.L vs. LCPE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither MEUD.L nor LCPE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEUD.L and LCPE.L have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MEUD.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MEUD.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LCPE.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Natixis. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MEUD.L and 0.65% for LCPE.L.
Find the right allocation for MEUD.L and LCPE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer