MEUD.L vs. IUHC.L
MEUD.L (Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc) and IUHC.L (iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - MEUD.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR, while IUHC.L is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MEUD.L returned 11.01%/yr vs 10.17%/yr for IUHC.L. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
MEUD.L vs. IUHC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MEUD.L is traded in GBp, while IUHC.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUHC.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MEUD.L achieves a 7.81% return, which is significantly higher than IUHC.L's -0.38% return. Over the past 10 years, MEUD.L has outperformed IUHC.L with an annualized return of 11.01%, while IUHC.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.17% annualized return.
MEUD.L
- 1D
- 1.76%
- 1M
- 3.68%
- YTD
- 7.81%
- 6M
- 9.49%
- 1Y
- 19.78%
- 3Y*
- 14.48%
- 5Y*
- 9.92%
- 10Y*
- 11.01%
IUHC.L
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 6.39%
- YTD
- -0.38%
- 6M
- 0.32%
- 1Y
- 16.26%
- 3Y*
- 4.70%
- 5Y*
- 6.84%
- 10Y*
- 10.17%
MEUD.L vs. IUHC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEUD.L Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc | 7.81% | 26.51% | 3.65% | 13.48% | -5.04% | 17.06% | 3.85% | 20.40% | -9.59% | 15.43% |
IUHC.L iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -0.38% | 6.55% | 3.95% | -3.36% | 8.95% | 28.79% | 8.64% | 15.97% | 10.72% | 11.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between MEUD.L and IUHC.L is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2015 | 0.51 |
The correlation between MEUD.L and IUHC.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MEUD.L vs. IUHC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MEUD.L
IUHC.L
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
Technology
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
MEUD.L
IUHC.L
-
Industrials
MEUD.L
IUHC.L
-
Healthcare
MEUD.L
IUHC.L
Technology
MEUD.L
IUHC.L
-
Consumer Defensive
MEUD.L
IUHC.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
MEUD.L
IUHC.L
-
Energy
MEUD.L
IUHC.L
-
Basic Materials
MEUD.L
IUHC.L
-
Utilities
MEUD.L
IUHC.L
-
Communication Services
MEUD.L
IUHC.L
-
Real Estate
MEUD.L
IUHC.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MEUD.L vs. IUHC.L — Risk / Return Rank
MEUD.L
IUHC.L
MEUD.L vs. IUHC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L) and iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MEUD.L | IUHC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.18 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | 1.38 | +0.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.77 | 3.47 | +3.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MEUD.L vs. IUHC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MEUD.L drawdown since its inception was -28.57%, which is greater than IUHC.L's maximum drawdown of -19.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEUD.L and IUHC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MEUD.L | IUHC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.57% | -19.70% | -8.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.53% | -11.71% | +1.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.61% | -19.70% | +7.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.09% | -19.70% | +2.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.57% | -19.70% | -8.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -3.75% | +3.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.89% | -4.71% | -2.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 4.66% | -1.74% |
Volatility
MEUD.L vs. IUHC.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L) is 3.54%, while iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L) has a volatility of 5.64%. This indicates that MEUD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUHC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MEUD.L | IUHC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.54% | 5.64% | -2.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.39% | 11.45% | -1.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.31% | 15.57% | -3.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.02% | 15.17% | +0.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.93% | 16.62% | +0.31% |
MEUD.L vs. IUHC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MEUD.L and IUHC.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MEUD.L vs. IUHC.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither MEUD.L nor IUHC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEUD.L and IUHC.L have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MEUD.L and IUHC.L have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
MEUD.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while IUHC.L is Health & Biotech Equities. MEUD.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while IUHC.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares.
Find the right allocation for MEUD.L and IUHC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer