PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEUD.L vs. IUES.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MEUD.L vs. IUES.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MEUD.L is traded in GBp, while IUES.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUES.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEUD.L achieves a 6.58% return, which is significantly lower than IUES.L's 31.41% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MEUD.L having a 10.28% annualized return and IUES.L not far behind at 10.07%.


MEUD.L

1D
0.58%
1M
3.26%
YTD
6.58%
6M
8.93%
1Y
19.54%
3Y*
14.05%
5Y*
9.89%
10Y*
10.28%

IUES.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.15%
YTD
31.41%
6M
28.75%
1Y
48.19%
3Y*
14.03%
5Y*
21.71%
10Y*
10.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEUD.L vs. IUES.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MEUD.L
Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc
6.58%26.51%3.65%13.48%-5.04%17.06%3.85%20.40%-9.59%15.43%
IUES.L
iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
30.98%1.99%5.69%-5.60%83.32%53.38%-35.31%4.67%-13.27%-9.73%

Correlation

The correlation between MEUD.L and IUES.L is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2015

0.38

The correlation between MEUD.L and IUES.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MEUD.L vs. IUES.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MEUD.L
IUES.L

Financial Services

24.0%

-

Industrials

20.1%

-

Healthcare

12.7%

-

Technology

9.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

7.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%

-

Energy

5.5%
100.0%

Basic Materials

5.0%

-

Utilities

4.5%

-

Communication Services

3.1%

-

Real Estate

1.2%

-

Financial Services

MEUD.L
24.0%
IUES.L

-

Industrials

MEUD.L
20.1%
IUES.L

-

Healthcare

MEUD.L
12.7%
IUES.L

-

Technology

MEUD.L
9.4%
IUES.L

-

Consumer Defensive

MEUD.L
7.7%
IUES.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

MEUD.L
6.9%
IUES.L

-

Energy

MEUD.L
5.5%
IUES.L
100.0%

Basic Materials

MEUD.L
5.0%
IUES.L

-

Utilities

MEUD.L
4.5%
IUES.L

-

Communication Services

MEUD.L
3.1%
IUES.L

-

Real Estate

MEUD.L
1.2%
IUES.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MEUD.L vs. IUES.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEUD.L
MEUD.L Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
MEUD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEUD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEUD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
MEUD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEUD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

IUES.L
IUES.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
IUES.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUES.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUES.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
IUES.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUES.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEUD.L vs. IUES.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MEUD.LIUES.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.36

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

2.89

-1.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.70

8.95

-2.25

MEUD.L vs. IUES.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEUD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the IUES.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEUD.L and IUES.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MEUD.LIUES.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

2.08

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.81

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.36

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.36

+0.24

Drawdowns

MEUD.L vs. IUES.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEUD.L drawdown since its inception was -28.57%, smaller than the maximum IUES.L drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEUD.L and IUES.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MEUD.LIUES.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.57%

-62.40%

+33.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.53%

-16.59%

+6.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.61%

-23.92%

+11.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.09%

-23.92%

+6.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.57%

-62.40%

+33.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

-8.77%

+7.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.16%

-16.00%

+11.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

5.37%

-2.46%

Volatility

MEUD.L vs. IUES.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L) is 4.14%, while iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L) has a volatility of 8.73%. This indicates that MEUD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUES.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MEUD.LIUES.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.14%

8.73%

-4.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.20%

19.54%

-9.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.14%

23.12%

-10.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.94%

26.63%

-12.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.92%

28.23%

-13.31%

MEUD.L vs. IUES.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MEUD.L and IUES.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MEUD.L vs. IUES.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MEUD.L nor IUES.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MEUD.L and IUES.L have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MEUD.L and IUES.L have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

MEUD.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while IUES.L is Energy Equities. MEUD.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while IUES.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MEUD.L and IUES.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer