MEUD.L vs. IUES.L
MEUD.L (Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc) and IUES.L (iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - MEUD.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR, while IUES.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MEUD.L returned 10.28%/yr vs 10.07%/yr for IUES.L. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
MEUD.L vs. IUES.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MEUD.L is traded in GBp, while IUES.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUES.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MEUD.L achieves a 6.58% return, which is significantly lower than IUES.L's 31.41% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MEUD.L having a 10.28% annualized return and IUES.L not far behind at 10.07%.
MEUD.L
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 3.26%
- YTD
- 6.58%
- 6M
- 8.93%
- 1Y
- 19.54%
- 3Y*
- 14.05%
- 5Y*
- 9.89%
- 10Y*
- 10.28%
IUES.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 31.41%
- 6M
- 28.75%
- 1Y
- 48.19%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 21.71%
- 10Y*
- 10.07%
MEUD.L vs. IUES.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEUD.L Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc | 6.58% | 26.51% | 3.65% | 13.48% | -5.04% | 17.06% | 3.85% | 20.40% | -9.59% | 15.43% |
IUES.L iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 30.98% | 1.99% | 5.69% | -5.60% | 83.32% | 53.38% | -35.31% | 4.67% | -13.27% | -9.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between MEUD.L and IUES.L is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2015 | 0.38 |
The correlation between MEUD.L and IUES.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MEUD.L vs. IUES.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MEUD.L
IUES.L
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
MEUD.L
IUES.L
-
Industrials
MEUD.L
IUES.L
-
Healthcare
MEUD.L
IUES.L
-
Technology
MEUD.L
IUES.L
-
Consumer Defensive
MEUD.L
IUES.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
MEUD.L
IUES.L
-
Energy
MEUD.L
IUES.L
Basic Materials
MEUD.L
IUES.L
-
Utilities
MEUD.L
IUES.L
-
Communication Services
MEUD.L
IUES.L
-
Real Estate
MEUD.L
IUES.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MEUD.L vs. IUES.L — Risk / Return Rank
MEUD.L
IUES.L
MEUD.L vs. IUES.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MEUD.L | IUES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.36 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 2.89 | -1.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.70 | 8.95 | -2.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MEUD.L | IUES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.60 | 2.08 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.81 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.36 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.36 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
MEUD.L vs. IUES.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MEUD.L drawdown since its inception was -28.57%, smaller than the maximum IUES.L drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEUD.L and IUES.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MEUD.L | IUES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.57% | -62.40% | +33.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.53% | -16.59% | +6.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.61% | -23.92% | +11.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.09% | -23.92% | +6.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.57% | -62.40% | +33.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.33% | -8.77% | +7.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.16% | -16.00% | +11.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 5.37% | -2.46% |
Volatility
MEUD.L vs. IUES.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L) is 4.14%, while iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L) has a volatility of 8.73%. This indicates that MEUD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUES.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MEUD.L | IUES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.14% | 8.73% | -4.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.20% | 19.54% | -9.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.14% | 23.12% | -10.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.94% | 26.63% | -12.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.92% | 28.23% | -13.31% |
MEUD.L vs. IUES.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MEUD.L and IUES.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MEUD.L vs. IUES.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither MEUD.L nor IUES.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEUD.L and IUES.L have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MEUD.L and IUES.L have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
MEUD.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while IUES.L is Energy Equities. MEUD.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while IUES.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares.
Find the right allocation for MEUD.L and IUES.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer