MEUD.L vs. IMV.L
MEUD.L (Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc) and IMV.L (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS) are both Europe Equities funds tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR, from Amundi and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MEUD.L returned 10.28%/yr vs 7.68%/yr for IMV.L. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MEUD.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IMV.L.
Performance
MEUD.L vs. IMV.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MEUD.L achieves a 6.58% return, which is significantly higher than IMV.L's 4.72% return. Over the past 10 years, MEUD.L has outperformed IMV.L with an annualized return of 10.28%, while IMV.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.68% annualized return.
MEUD.L
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 3.26%
- YTD
- 6.58%
- 6M
- 8.93%
- 1Y
- 19.54%
- 3Y*
- 14.05%
- 5Y*
- 9.89%
- 10Y*
- 10.28%
IMV.L
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- YTD
- 4.72%
- 6M
- 5.90%
- 1Y
- 8.30%
- 3Y*
- 10.49%
- 5Y*
- 7.54%
- 10Y*
- 7.68%
MEUD.L vs. IMV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEUD.L Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc | 6.58% | 26.51% | 3.65% | 13.48% | -5.04% | 17.06% | 3.85% | 20.40% | -9.59% | 15.43% |
IMV.L iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS | 4.72% | 17.66% | 6.63% | 8.56% | -7.83% | 13.68% | 1.50% | 16.37% | -2.91% | 13.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between MEUD.L and IMV.L is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2013 | 0.89 |
The correlation between MEUD.L and IMV.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MEUD.L vs. IMV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MEUD.L
IMV.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
MEUD.L
IMV.L
Industrials
MEUD.L
IMV.L
Healthcare
MEUD.L
IMV.L
Technology
MEUD.L
IMV.L
Consumer Defensive
MEUD.L
IMV.L
Consumer Cyclical
MEUD.L
IMV.L
Energy
MEUD.L
IMV.L
Basic Materials
MEUD.L
IMV.L
Utilities
MEUD.L
IMV.L
Communication Services
MEUD.L
IMV.L
Real Estate
MEUD.L
IMV.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MEUD.L vs. IMV.L — Risk / Return Rank
MEUD.L
IMV.L
MEUD.L vs. IMV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS (IMV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MEUD.L | IMV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.17 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 0.97 | +0.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.70 | 2.92 | +3.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MEUD.L | IMV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.60 | 0.91 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.69 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.62 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.71 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
MEUD.L vs. IMV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MEUD.L drawdown since its inception was -28.57%, which is greater than IMV.L's maximum drawdown of -24.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEUD.L and IMV.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MEUD.L | IMV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.57% | -24.48% | -4.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.53% | -8.50% | -2.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.61% | -8.50% | -4.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.09% | -17.42% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.57% | -24.48% | -4.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.33% | -4.62% | +3.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.16% | -3.57% | -0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 2.83% | +0.08% |
Volatility
MEUD.L vs. IMV.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L) has a higher volatility of 4.14% compared to iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS (IMV.L) at 2.89%. This indicates that MEUD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MEUD.L | IMV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.14% | 2.89% | +1.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.20% | 7.71% | +2.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.14% | 9.13% | +3.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.94% | 10.97% | +2.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.92% | 12.31% | +2.61% |
MEUD.L vs. IMV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MEUD.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IMV.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MEUD.L vs. IMV.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither MEUD.L nor IMV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEUD.L and IMV.L have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MEUD.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MEUD.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IMV.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MEUD.L and 0.25% for IMV.L.
Find the right allocation for MEUD.L and IMV.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer