PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEUD.L vs. IEFV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MEUD.L vs. IEFV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (IEFV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEUD.L achieves a 8.91% return, which is significantly lower than IEFV.L's 14.64% return. Over the past 10 years, MEUD.L has underperformed IEFV.L with an annualized return of 11.00%, while IEFV.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.59% annualized return.


MEUD.L

1D
0.65%
1M
1.69%
YTD
8.91%
6M
9.35%
1Y
23.65%
3Y*
15.66%
5Y*
10.07%
10Y*
11.00%

IEFV.L

1D
1.36%
1M
1.12%
YTD
14.64%
6M
15.38%
1Y
38.77%
3Y*
22.78%
5Y*
15.04%
10Y*
12.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEUD.L vs. IEFV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MEUD.L
Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc
8.91%26.51%3.65%13.48%-5.04%17.06%3.85%20.40%-9.59%15.43%
IEFV.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF
14.64%42.20%5.40%11.41%1.47%18.58%-3.74%15.71%-12.67%14.28%

Correlation

The correlation between MEUD.L and IEFV.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2015

0.91

The correlation between MEUD.L and IEFV.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

MEUD.L vs. IEFV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MEUD.L
IEFV.L

Financial Services

24.6%
23.6%

Industrials

20.1%
18.8%

Healthcare

12.3%
13.2%

Technology

9.7%
9.7%

Consumer Defensive

7.6%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

7.2%
6.5%

Energy

5.1%
5.2%

Basic Materials

5.0%
5.5%

Utilities

4.4%
4.8%

Communication Services

2.9%
3.6%

Real Estate

1.2%
0.7%

Financial Services

MEUD.L
24.6%
IEFV.L
23.6%

Industrials

MEUD.L
20.1%
IEFV.L
18.8%

Healthcare

MEUD.L
12.3%
IEFV.L
13.2%

Technology

MEUD.L
9.7%
IEFV.L
9.7%

Consumer Defensive

MEUD.L
7.6%
IEFV.L
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

MEUD.L
7.2%
IEFV.L
6.5%

Energy

MEUD.L
5.1%
IEFV.L
5.2%

Basic Materials

MEUD.L
5.0%
IEFV.L
5.5%

Utilities

MEUD.L
4.4%
IEFV.L
4.8%

Communication Services

MEUD.L
2.9%
IEFV.L
3.6%

Real Estate

MEUD.L
1.2%
IEFV.L
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MEUD.L vs. IEFV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEUD.L
MEUD.L Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
MEUD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEUD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEUD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
MEUD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEUD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

IEFV.L
IEFV.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
IEFV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEFV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEFV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
IEFV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEFV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEUD.L vs. IEFV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (IEFV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MEUD.LIEFV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.53

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

3.65

-1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.12

13.42

-5.30

MEUD.L vs. IEFV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEUD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is lower than the IEFV.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEUD.L and IEFV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MEUD.L vs. IEFV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEUD.L drawdown since its inception was -28.57%, smaller than the maximum IEFV.L drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEUD.L and IEFV.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MEUD.LIEFV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.57%

-34.64%

+6.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.53%

-10.57%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.61%

-15.02%

+2.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.09%

-16.16%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.57%

-34.64%

+6.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

0.00%

-0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.88%

-6.18%

-0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

2.88%

+0.03%

Volatility

MEUD.L vs. IEFV.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L) is 3.06%, while iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (IEFV.L) has a volatility of 3.84%. This indicates that MEUD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEFV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MEUD.LIEFV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.06%

3.84%

-0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.37%

11.09%

-0.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.20%

13.43%

-1.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.01%

17.10%

-1.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.91%

17.58%

-0.67%

MEUD.L vs. IEFV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEUD.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IEFV.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MEUD.L vs. IEFV.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MEUD.L nor IEFV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, MEUD.L and IEFV.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, MEUD.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MEUD.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IEFV.L.

MEUD.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while IEFV.L tracks MSCI Europe Value NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MEUD.L and 0.25% for IEFV.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MEUD.L and IEFV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer