PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEUD.L vs. IEDL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MEUD.L vs. IEDL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IEDL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MEUD.L is traded in GBp, while IEDL.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IEDL.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEUD.L achieves a 6.58% return, which is significantly lower than IEDL.L's 13.19% return.


MEUD.L

1D
0.58%
1M
3.26%
YTD
6.58%
6M
8.93%
1Y
19.54%
3Y*
14.05%
5Y*
9.89%
10Y*
10.28%

IEDL.L

1D
0.03%
1M
4.86%
YTD
13.19%
6M
15.86%
1Y
36.33%
3Y*
21.75%
5Y*
14.62%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEUD.L vs. IEDL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MEUD.L
Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc
6.58%26.51%3.65%13.48%-5.04%17.06%3.85%20.40%-7.33%
IEDL.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
13.19%42.22%5.44%11.24%1.22%19.20%-3.60%14.87%-10.37%

Correlation

The correlation between MEUD.L and IEDL.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2018

0.88

The correlation between MEUD.L and IEDL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

MEUD.L vs. IEDL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MEUD.L
IEDL.L

Financial Services

24.0%
22.6%

Industrials

20.1%
17.0%

Healthcare

12.7%
12.3%

Technology

9.4%
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%
6.2%

Energy

5.5%
5.1%

Basic Materials

5.0%
6.2%

Utilities

4.5%
4.5%

Communication Services

3.1%
3.7%

Real Estate

1.2%
0.6%

Financial Services

MEUD.L
24.0%
IEDL.L
22.6%

Industrials

MEUD.L
20.1%
IEDL.L
17.0%

Healthcare

MEUD.L
12.7%
IEDL.L
12.3%

Technology

MEUD.L
9.4%
IEDL.L
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

MEUD.L
7.7%
IEDL.L
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

MEUD.L
6.9%
IEDL.L
6.2%

Energy

MEUD.L
5.5%
IEDL.L
5.1%

Basic Materials

MEUD.L
5.0%
IEDL.L
6.2%

Utilities

MEUD.L
4.5%
IEDL.L
4.5%

Communication Services

MEUD.L
3.1%
IEDL.L
3.7%

Real Estate

MEUD.L
1.2%
IEDL.L
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MEUD.L vs. IEDL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEUD.L
MEUD.L Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
MEUD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEUD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEUD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
MEUD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEUD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

IEDL.L
IEDL.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
IEDL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEDL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEDL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
IEDL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEDL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEUD.L vs. IEDL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IEDL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MEUD.LIEDL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.48

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

3.43

-1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.70

12.68

-5.99

MEUD.L vs. IEDL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEUD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is lower than the IEDL.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEUD.L and IEDL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MEUD.LIEDL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

2.68

-1.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.95

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.59

+0.01

Drawdowns

MEUD.L vs. IEDL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEUD.L drawdown since its inception was -28.57%, smaller than the maximum IEDL.L drawdown of -34.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEUD.L and IEDL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MEUD.LIEDL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.57%

-34.37%

+5.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.53%

-10.54%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.61%

-16.23%

+3.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.09%

-16.28%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

-0.80%

-0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.16%

-5.72%

+1.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

2.86%

+0.05%

Volatility

MEUD.L vs. IEDL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L) is 4.14%, while iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IEDL.L) has a volatility of 4.75%. This indicates that MEUD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEDL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MEUD.LIEDL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.14%

4.75%

-0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.20%

11.06%

-0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.14%

13.48%

-1.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.94%

15.30%

-1.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.92%

17.59%

-2.67%

MEUD.L vs. IEDL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEUD.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IEDL.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MEUD.L vs. IEDL.L - Dividend Comparison

MEUD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IEDL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IEDL.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
3.01%3.44%4.22%4.76%4.23%3.56%2.32%3.86%3.19%
MEUD.L
Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, MEUD.L and IEDL.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, MEUD.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MEUD.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IEDL.L.

MEUD.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while IEDL.L tracks MSCI Europe Value NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MEUD.L and 0.25% for IEDL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MEUD.L and IEDL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer