MEUD.L vs. CEUR.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MEUD.L (Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc) and CEUR.L (Amundi MSCI Europe) are both Europe Equities funds from Amundi tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MEUD.L returned 10.28%/yr vs 9.88%/yr for CEUR.L. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. MEUD.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for CEUR.L.

Performance

MEUD.L vs. CEUR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L) and Amundi MSCI Europe (CEUR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MEUD.L having a 6.58% return and CEUR.L slightly higher at 6.66%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MEUD.L having a 10.28% annualized return and CEUR.L not far behind at 9.88%.

MEUD.L

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 3.26%
• YTD: 6.58%
• 6M: 8.93%
• 1Y: 19.54%
• 3Y*: 14.05%
• 5Y*: 9.89%
• 10Y*: 10.28%

CEUR.L

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 3.94%
• YTD: 6.66%
• 6M: 8.98%
• 1Y: 19.26%
• 3Y*: 13.68%
• 5Y*: 9.47%
• 10Y*: 9.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEUD.L vs. CEUR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MEUD.L Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc	6.58%	26.51%	3.65%	13.48%	-5.04%	17.06%	3.85%	20.40%	-9.59%	15.43%
CEUR.L Amundi MSCI Europe	6.66%	24.46%	4.90%	12.93%	-5.96%	17.02%	2.29%	19.59%	-9.49%	14.99%

Correlation

The correlation between MEUD.L and CEUR.L is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.99
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2013	0.98

The correlation between MEUD.L and CEUR.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

MEUD.L vs. CEUR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MEUD.L	CEUR.L
Financial Services	24.0%	25.1%
Industrials	20.1%	19.8%
Healthcare	12.7%	13.8%
Technology	9.4%	10.4%
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	7.2%
Consumer Cyclical	6.9%	6.2%
Energy	5.5%	3.5%
Basic Materials	5.0%	3.8%
Utilities	4.5%	5.3%
Communication Services	3.1%	3.4%
Real Estate	1.2%	1.7%

Return for Risk

MEUD.L vs. CEUR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEUD.L

MEUD.L Risk / Return Rank: 45
MEUD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
MEUD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
MEUD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 49
MEUD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
MEUD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 43

CEUR.L

CEUR.L Risk / Return Rank: 42
CEUR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
CEUR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
CEUR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 47
CEUR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
CEUR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEUD.L vs. CEUR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L) and Amundi MSCI Europe (CEUR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MEUD.L	CEUR.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.60	1.54	+0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.26	2.18	+0.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.29	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.85	1.74	+0.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.70	6.06	+0.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MEUD.L vs. CEUR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEUD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the CEUR.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEUD.L and CEUR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MEUD.L	CEUR.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.60	1.54	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	0.68	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69	0.66	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	0.56	+0.04

Drawdowns

MEUD.L vs. CEUR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEUD.L drawdown since its inception was -28.57%, roughly equal to the maximum CEUR.L drawdown of -28.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEUD.L and CEUR.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	MEUD.L	CEUR.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.57%	-28.63%	+0.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.53%	-11.05%	+0.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.61%	-12.66%	+0.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.09%	-17.85%	+0.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.57%	-28.63%	+0.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.33%	-1.52%	+0.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.16%	-4.58%	+0.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.91%	3.17%	-0.26%

Volatility

MEUD.L vs. CEUR.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L) and Amundi MSCI Europe (CEUR.L) have volatilities of 4.14% and 4.25%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MEUD.L	CEUR.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.14%	4.25%	-0.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.20%	10.53%	-0.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.14%	12.44%	-0.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.94%	13.88%	+0.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.92%	14.97%	-0.05%

MEUD.L vs. CEUR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEUD.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than CEUR.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

MEUD.L vs. CEUR.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MEUD.L nor CEUR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MEUD.L and CEUR.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, MEUD.L and CEUR.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, MEUD.L or CEUR.L?

On fees, CEUR.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MEUD.L or CEUR.L?

CEUR.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MEUD.L.

What is the main difference between MEUD.L and CEUR.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI Europe NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MEUD.L and 0.05% for CEUR.L.