METP.L vs. NATO.L
METP.L (HANetf ETC Group Global Metaverse UCITS ETF) and NATO.L (HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - METP.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while NATO.L is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the EQM Future of Defence Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, METP.L returned 1.61% vs 21.41% for NATO.L. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. METP.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for NATO.L.
Performance
METP.L vs. NATO.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
METP.L is traded in GBp, while NATO.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NATO.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METP.L achieves a -2.96% return, which is significantly lower than NATO.L's 13.47% return.
METP.L
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 9.18%
- YTD
- -2.96%
- 6M
- -8.15%
- 1Y
- 1.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NATO.L
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 10.08%
- YTD
- 13.47%
- 6M
- 16.91%
- 1Y
- 21.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
METP.L vs. NATO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
METP.L HANetf ETC Group Global Metaverse UCITS ETF | -2.96% | 21.88% |
NATO.L HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating | 13.47% | 20.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between METP.L and NATO.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METP.L vs. NATO.L — Risk / Return Rank
METP.L
NATO.L
METP.L vs. NATO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf ETC Group Global Metaverse UCITS ETF (METP.L) and HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating (NATO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| METP.L | NATO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.19 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.09 | 1.86 | -1.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.16 | 4.06 | -3.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| METP.L | NATO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 | 1.06 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 1.39 | -1.06 |
Drawdowns
METP.L vs. NATO.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METP.L drawdown since its inception was -53.17%, which is greater than NATO.L's maximum drawdown of -21.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METP.L and NATO.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METP.L | NATO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.17% | -21.71% | -31.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.17% | -11.45% | -41.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.76% | -2.00% | -37.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.08% | -2.46% | -20.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.79% | 5.26% | +26.53% |
Volatility
METP.L vs. NATO.L - Volatility Comparison
HANetf ETC Group Global Metaverse UCITS ETF (METP.L) has a higher volatility of 8.47% compared to HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating (NATO.L) at 6.35%. This indicates that METP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NATO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METP.L | NATO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.47% | 6.35% | +2.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.76% | 15.87% | +3.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.01% | 20.04% | +31.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.93% | 27.09% | +23.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.93% | 27.09% | +23.84% |
METP.L vs. NATO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
METP.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than NATO.L's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
METP.L vs. NATO.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither METP.L nor NATO.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
METP.L and NATO.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NATO.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NATO.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for METP.L.
METP.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while NATO.L is Aerospace & Defense. METP.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while NATO.L tracks EQM Future of Defence Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for METP.L and 0.49% for NATO.L.
Find the right allocation for METP.L and NATO.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer