PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
METE.TO vs. SOXU.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

METE.TO vs. SOXU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (METE.TO) and MegaLong (3X) US Semiconductors Daily Leveraged Alternative ETF (SOXU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METE.TO achieves a -4.55% return, which is significantly lower than SOXU.TO's 538.96% return.


METE.TO

1D
5.47%
1M
4.67%
YTD
-4.55%
6M
-2.86%
1Y
-5.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SOXU.TO

1D
5.63%
1M
123.65%
YTD
538.96%
6M
517.85%
1Y
1,567.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METE.TO vs. SOXU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between METE.TO and SOXU.TO is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2025

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

METE.TO vs. SOXU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METE.TO
METE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
METE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
METE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
METE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
METE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
METE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

SOXU.TO
SOXU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
SOXU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METE.TO vs. SOXU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (METE.TO) and MegaLong (3X) US Semiconductors Daily Leveraged Alternative ETF (SOXU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


METE.TOSOXU.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.16

15.58

-15.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.02

5.37

-5.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.75

-0.74

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.17

37.08

-37.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.36

124.73

-125.09

METE.TO vs. SOXU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current METE.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is lower than the SOXU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 15.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METE.TO and SOXU.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


METE.TOSOXU.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

15.58

-15.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.09

14.98

-15.07

Drawdowns

METE.TO vs. SOXU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METE.TO drawdown since its inception was -40.10%, smaller than the maximum SOXU.TO drawdown of -42.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METE.TO and SOXU.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


METE.TOSOXU.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.10%

-42.78%

+2.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.48%

-42.78%

+7.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.07%

0.00%

-22.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.68%

-8.28%

-7.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.51%

12.69%

+3.82%

Volatility

METE.TO vs. SOXU.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (METE.TO) is 9.99%, while MegaLong (3X) US Semiconductors Daily Leveraged Alternative ETF (SOXU.TO) has a volatility of 40.22%. This indicates that METE.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


METE.TOSOXU.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.99%

40.22%

-30.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.26%

81.21%

-52.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.57%

101.81%

-65.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.08%

101.21%

-59.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.08%

101.21%

-59.13%

METE.TO vs. SOXU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

METE.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than SOXU.TO's 1.81% expense ratio.


Dividends

METE.TO vs. SOXU.TO - Dividend Comparison

METE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.77%, while SOXU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


METE.TO and SOXU.TO have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, METE.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

METE.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.81% for SOXU.TO.

METE.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while SOXU.TO is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Harvest Portfolios Group and LongPoint. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for METE.TO and 1.81% for SOXU.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for METE.TO and SOXU.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer