METE.TO vs. GOGY.TO
METE.TO (Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units) and GOGY.TO (Harvest Alphabet Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, METE.TO returned -5.95% vs 123.99% for GOGY.TO. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.40% expense ratio.
Performance
METE.TO vs. GOGY.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METE.TO achieves a -4.55% return, which is significantly lower than GOGY.TO's 14.33% return.
METE.TO
- 1D
- 5.47%
- 1M
- 4.67%
- YTD
- -4.55%
- 6M
- -2.86%
- 1Y
- -5.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GOGY.TO
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- -5.59%
- YTD
- 14.33%
- 6M
- 10.62%
- 1Y
- 123.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
METE.TO vs. GOGY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
METE.TO Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | -4.55% | -1.81% |
GOGY.TO Harvest Alphabet Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units | 14.33% | 80.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between METE.TO and GOGY.TO is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2025 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METE.TO vs. GOGY.TO — Risk / Return Rank
METE.TO
GOGY.TO
METE.TO vs. GOGY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (METE.TO) and Harvest Alphabet Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units (GOGY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| METE.TO | GOGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | 4.08 | -4.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.02 | 5.07 | -5.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.62 | -0.61 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.17 | 6.19 | -6.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.36 | 22.77 | -23.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| METE.TO | GOGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 | 4.08 | -4.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.09 | 2.31 | -2.40 |
Drawdowns
METE.TO vs. GOGY.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METE.TO drawdown since its inception was -40.10%, which is greater than GOGY.TO's maximum drawdown of -20.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METE.TO and GOGY.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METE.TO | GOGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.10% | -20.87% | -19.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.48% | -20.14% | -15.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.07% | -10.57% | -11.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.68% | -5.07% | -10.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.51% | 5.47% | +11.04% |
Volatility
METE.TO vs. GOGY.TO - Volatility Comparison
Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (METE.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.99% compared to Harvest Alphabet Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units (GOGY.TO) at 9.16%. This indicates that METE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOGY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METE.TO | GOGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.99% | 9.16% | +0.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.26% | 21.42% | +6.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.57% | 30.67% | +5.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.08% | 34.61% | +7.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.08% | 34.61% | +7.47% |
METE.TO vs. GOGY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both METE.TO and GOGY.TO have an expense ratio of 0.40%.
Dividends
METE.TO vs. GOGY.TO - Dividend Comparison
METE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.77%, more than GOGY.TO's 12.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GOGY.TO Harvest Alphabet Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units | 12.78% | 8.04% |
METE.TO Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | 25.77% | 21.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
METE.TO and GOGY.TO have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
METE.TO and GOGY.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.
They also come from different issuers: Harvest Portfolios Group and Harvest.
Find the right allocation for METE.TO and GOGY.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer