METE.TO vs. EMAX.TO

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

METE.TO (Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units) and EMAX.TO (Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - METE.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group, while EMAX.TO is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Hamilton Capital. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, METE.TO returned -10.91% vs 48.14% for EMAX.TO. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. METE.TO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for EMAX.TO.

Performance

METE.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (METE.TO) and Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (EMAX.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METE.TO achieves a -9.50% return, which is significantly lower than EMAX.TO's 30.76% return.

METE.TO

• 1D: -0.87%
• 1M: -0.24%
• YTD: -9.50%
• 6M: -8.95%
• 1Y: -10.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EMAX.TO

• 1D: 1.73%
• 1M: 0.51%
• YTD: 30.76%
• 6M: 24.14%
• 1Y: 48.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METE.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
METE.TO Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units	-9.50%	-0.67%
EMAX.TO Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF	30.76%	-1.97%

Correlation

The correlation between METE.TO and EMAX.TO is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2025	-0.04

The correlation between METE.TO and EMAX.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to -0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

METE.TO vs. EMAX.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METE.TO

METE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6
METE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
METE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
METE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6
METE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
METE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6

EMAX.TO

EMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 70
EMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
EMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
EMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 64
EMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
EMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METE.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (METE.TO) and Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (EMAX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	METE.TO	EMAX.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.30	2.42	-2.72
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.20	3.13	-3.33
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.39	-0.41
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.22	3.90	-4.13
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.48	12.55	-13.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

METE.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current METE.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.30, which is lower than the EMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METE.TO and EMAX.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	METE.TO	EMAX.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.30	2.42	-2.72
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.18	0.73	-0.91

Drawdowns

METE.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METE.TO drawdown since its inception was -40.10%, which is greater than EMAX.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METE.TO and EMAX.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	METE.TO	EMAX.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.10%	-27.55%	-12.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.48%	-12.39%	-23.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.11%	-3.72%	-22.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.66%	-9.31%	-6.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.45%	3.85%	+12.60%

Volatility

METE.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Volatility Comparison

Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (METE.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.44% compared to Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (EMAX.TO) at 7.47%. This indicates that METE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMAX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	METE.TO	EMAX.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.44%	7.47%	+0.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.75%	15.32%	+12.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.31%	20.03%	+16.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	41.89%	22.41%	+19.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.89%	22.41%	+19.48%

METE.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

METE.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than EMAX.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

METE.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Dividend Comparison

METE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.18%, more than EMAX.TO's 10.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
EMAX.TO Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF	10.25%	13.44%	12.31%
METE.TO Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units	27.18%	21.31%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both METE.TO and EMAX.TO in my portfolio?

METE.TO and EMAX.TO have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, METE.TO or EMAX.TO?

On fees, METE.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, METE.TO or EMAX.TO?

METE.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for EMAX.TO.

What is the main difference between METE.TO and EMAX.TO?

METE.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while EMAX.TO is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Harvest Portfolios Group and Hamilton Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for METE.TO and 0.65% for EMAX.TO.