META.NEO vs. NVDA.NEO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Meta Platforms Inc. CDR (META.NEO) and NVIDIA Corporation CDR (NVDA.NEO).

Performance

META.NEO vs. NVDA.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Meta Platforms Inc. CDR (META.NEO) and NVIDIA Corporation CDR (NVDA.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

META.NEO vs. NVDA.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
META.NEO Meta Platforms Inc. CDR	-12.70%	10.12%	63.82%	188.42%	-43.96%
NVDA.NEO NVIDIA Corporation CDR	-6.35%	34.83%	167.17%	233.75%	-46.70%

Fundamentals

Market Cap META.NEO : CA$79.86B NVDA.NEO : CA$963.21B
EPS META.NEO : CA$1.78 NVDA.NEO : CA$4.07
PE Ratio META.NEO : 17.46 NVDA.NEO : 9.73
PS Ratio META.NEO : 5.39 NVDA.NEO : 5.16
PB Ratio META.NEO : 0.41 NVDA.NEO : 8.10
Total Revenue (TTM) META.NEO : CA$189.46B NVDA.NEO : CA$187.14B
Gross Profit (TTM) META.NEO : CA$155.35B NVDA.NEO : CA$131.09B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, META.NEO achieves a -12.70% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA.NEO's -6.35% return.

META.NEO

• 1D: 1.24%
• 1M: -11.66%
• YTD: -12.70%
• 6M: -20.28%
• 1Y: -3.37%
• 3Y*: 37.40%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NVDA.NEO

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: -4.01%
• YTD: -6.35%
• 6M: -7.41%
• 1Y: 55.83%
• 3Y*: 81.15%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

META.NEO vs. NVDA.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

META.NEO

META.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 35
META.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
META.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
META.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 32
META.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
META.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 38

NVDA.NEO

NVDA.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 81
NVDA.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
NVDA.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
NVDA.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 77
NVDA.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
NVDA.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

META.NEO vs. NVDA.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meta Platforms Inc. CDR (META.NEO) and NVIDIA Corporation CDR (NVDA.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	META.NEO	NVDA.NEO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.09	1.41	-1.50
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.16	2.10	-1.94
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.27	-0.25
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.05	2.78	-2.83
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.12	6.94	-7.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

META.NEO vs. NVDA.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current META.NEO Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is lower than the NVDA.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of META.NEO and NVDA.NEO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	META.NEO	NVDA.NEO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.09	1.41	-1.50
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	1.09	-0.84

Correlation

The correlation between META.NEO and NVDA.NEO is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

META.NEO vs. NVDA.NEO - Dividend Comparison

META.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, more than NVDA.NEO's 0.03% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
META.NEO Meta Platforms Inc. CDR	0.50%	0.45%	0.47%	0.00%	0.00%
NVDA.NEO NVIDIA Corporation CDR	0.03%	0.03%	0.03%	0.04%	0.11%

Drawdowns

META.NEO vs. NVDA.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum META.NEO drawdown since its inception was -74.98%, which is greater than NVDA.NEO's maximum drawdown of -61.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for META.NEO and NVDA.NEO.

Drawdown Indicators

	META.NEO	NVDA.NEO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.98%	-61.15%	-13.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.30%	-21.04%	-13.26%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.81%	-16.13%	-11.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.65%	-15.99%	-5.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.90%	8.44%	+5.46%

Volatility

META.NEO vs. NVDA.NEO - Volatility Comparison

Meta Platforms Inc. CDR (META.NEO) has a higher volatility of 13.28% compared to NVIDIA Corporation CDR (NVDA.NEO) at 10.01%. This indicates that META.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	META.NEO	NVDA.NEO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.28%	10.01%	+3.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.34%	24.74%	+1.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.18%	39.81%	-0.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.18%	51.59%	-6.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	45.18%	51.59%	-6.41%

Financials

META.NEO vs. NVDA.NEO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Meta Platforms Inc. CDR and NVIDIA Corporation CDR over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

META.NEO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Meta Platforms Inc. CDR reported a gross profit of 42.04B and revenue of 51.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.0%.

NVDA.NEO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, NVIDIA Corporation CDR reported a gross profit of 41.85B and revenue of 57.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.4%.

META.NEO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Meta Platforms Inc. CDR reported an operating income of 20.54B and revenue of 51.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.1%.

NVDA.NEO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, NVIDIA Corporation CDR reported an operating income of 36.01B and revenue of 57.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 63.2%.

META.NEO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Meta Platforms Inc. CDR reported a net income of 2.71B and revenue of 51.24B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.

NVDA.NEO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, NVIDIA Corporation CDR reported a net income of 31.91B and revenue of 57.01B, resulting in a net margin of 56.0%.