PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEQAX vs. FAOSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MEQAX vs. FAOSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century International Value Fund (MEQAX) and Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z (FAOSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MEQAX

1D
0.32%
1M
2.65%
YTD
12.34%
6M
16.23%
1Y
29.64%
3Y*
22.26%
5Y*
10.81%
10Y*
9.14%

FAOSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
-1.63%
3Y*
8.88%
5Y*
3.79%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEQAX vs. FAOSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MEQAX
American Century International Value Fund
12.34%41.64%3.73%19.48%-11.64%8.39%8.93%12.14%-17.30%16.55%
FAOSX
Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z
0.00%15.36%5.06%20.52%-24.31%19.42%15.17%27.96%-14.73%26.25%

Correlation

The correlation between MEQAX and FAOSX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017

0.83

Over the past year, the correlation between MEQAX and FAOSX has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MEQAX vs. FAOSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEQAX
MEQAX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
MEQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
MEQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

FAOSX
FAOSX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
FAOSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAOSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAOSX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
FAOSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAOSX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEQAX vs. FAOSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century International Value Fund (MEQAX) and Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z (FAOSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MEQAXFAOSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

0.95

+0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

-0.34

+3.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.90

-0.59

+12.48

MEQAX vs. FAOSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEQAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the FAOSX Sharpe Ratio of -0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEQAX and FAOSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MEQAXFAOSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

-0.27

+2.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.23

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.50

-0.26

Drawdowns

MEQAX vs. FAOSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEQAX drawdown since its inception was -60.32%, which is greater than FAOSX's maximum drawdown of -36.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEQAX and FAOSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MEQAXFAOSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.32%

-36.24%

-24.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.35%

-7.26%

-2.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.84%

-13.96%

+1.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.91%

-36.24%

+6.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.28%

-5.86%

+4.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.94%

-7.93%

-7.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

3.97%

-1.56%

Volatility

MEQAX vs. FAOSX - Volatility Comparison

American Century International Value Fund (MEQAX) has a higher volatility of 3.74% compared to Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z (FAOSX) at 0.00%. This indicates that MEQAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAOSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MEQAXFAOSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

0.00%

+3.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.67%

4.08%

+6.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.48%

9.18%

+4.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.36%

16.72%

-1.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.79%

16.68%

+0.11%

MEQAX vs. FAOSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEQAX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FAOSX's 1.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

MEQAX vs. FAOSX - Dividend Comparison

MEQAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.01%, less than FAOSX's 8.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAOSX
Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z
8.67%8.67%1.80%1.12%0.85%2.07%0.00%1.70%5.30%3.93%0.00%0.00%
MEQAX
American Century International Value Fund
7.01%7.87%3.66%4.28%3.72%4.95%1.11%3.27%3.31%2.80%0.43%2.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


MEQAX and FAOSX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MEQAX has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to FAOSX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEQAX dropped -60.32% vs FAOSX's -36.24%.

MEQAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MEQAX and FAOSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer