MEMS vs. DRLL

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

MEMS (Matthews Emerging Markets Discovery Active ETF) and DRLL (Strive U.S. Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MEMS is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by Matthews, while DRLL is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg US Energy Select Index. MEMS is actively managed, while DRLL is passively managed. Over the past year, MEMS returned 22.43% vs 41.89% for DRLL. Their 0.05 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MEMS charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for DRLL.

Performance

MEMS vs. DRLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Emerging Markets Discovery Active ETF (MEMS) and Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEMS achieves a 20.04% return, which is significantly lower than DRLL's 33.53% return.

MEMS

• 1D: 3.08%
• 1M: -3.07%
• 6M: 12.20%
• YTD: 20.04%
• 1Y: 22.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.53%

DRLL

• 1D: -1.05%
• 1M: 11.55%
• 6M: 17.30%
• YTD: 33.53%
• 1Y: 41.89%
• 3Y*: 12.03%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DRLL Strive U.S. Energy ETF	$455.44K	$502.20K	$532.52K
MEMS Matthews Emerging Markets Discovery Active ETF	$27.68K	$28.35K	$30.35K

MEMS vs. DRLL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MEMS Matthews Emerging Markets Discovery Active ETF	20.04%	11.12%	-5.32%
DRLL Strive U.S. Energy ETF	33.53%	7.74%	2.50%

Correlation

The correlation between MEMS and DRLL is -0.20, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024	0.05

The correlation between MEMS and DRLL shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MEMS vs. DRLL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MEMS	DRLL
Technology	34.1%	-
Financial Services	16.5%	-
Industrials	15.7%	-
Consumer Cyclical	13.4%	0.9%
Healthcare	8.3%	-
Consumer Defensive	3.7%	-
Communication Services	2.7%	-
Real Estate	2.2%	-
Energy	2.0%	99.1%
Basic Materials	1.4%	-
Utilities	1.0%	-

Return for Risk

MEMS vs. DRLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MEMS

MEMS Risk / Return Rank: 37
MEMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
MEMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
MEMS Omega Ratio Rank: 35
MEMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
MEMS Martin Ratio Rank: 39

DRLL

DRLL Risk / Return Rank: 61
DRLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
DRLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
DRLL Omega Ratio Rank: 62
DRLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
DRLL Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MEMS vs. DRLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Emerging Markets Discovery Active ETF (MEMS) and Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MEMS	DRLL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.98	1.83	-0.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.47	2.37	-0.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.30	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.69	2.48	-0.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.73	6.29	-1.56

MEMS vs. DRLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEMS Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the DRLL Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEMS and DRLL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MEMS vs. DRLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEMS drawdown since its inception was -22.24%, smaller than the maximum DRLL drawdown of -23.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEMS and DRLL.

Drawdown Indicators

	MEMS	DRLL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.24%	-23.73%	+1.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.29%	-16.99%	+3.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.80%	-6.51%	+0.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.24%	-8.14%	+2.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.76%	6.68%	-1.92%

Volatility

MEMS vs. DRLL - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Emerging Markets Discovery Active ETF (MEMS) has a higher volatility of 8.18% compared to Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL) at 7.12%. This indicates that MEMS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MEMS	DRLL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.18%	7.12%	+1.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.68%	18.68%	+2.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.97%	22.97%	0.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.18%	23.79%	-3.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.18%	23.79%	-3.61%

MEMS vs. DRLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEMS has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than DRLL's 0.41% expense ratio.

Dividends

MEMS vs. DRLL - Dividend Comparison

MEMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, more than DRLL's 2.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
DRLL Strive U.S. Energy ETF	2.27%	2.99%	3.00%	3.01%	1.18%
MEMS Matthews Emerging Markets Discovery Active ETF	2.34%	2.81%	1.42%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MEMS and DRLL in my portfolio?

MEMS and DRLL have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MEMS or DRLL?

MEMS has higher volatility (8.18%) compared to DRLL (7.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEMS dropped -22.24% vs DRLL's -23.73%.

Which ETF is better, MEMS or DRLL?

On 1-year performance, DRLL leads with 41.89% vs 22.43% for MEMS. On fees, DRLL is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, DRLL has been the lower-risk option at 7.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MEMS or DRLL?

Over the 1-year period, DRLL has performed better with a 41.89% return vs 22.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MEMS or DRLL?

DRLL is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for MEMS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MEMS or DRLL?

MEMS has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 2.27% for DRLL.

What is the main difference between MEMS and DRLL?

MEMS is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while DRLL is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Matthews and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for MEMS and 0.41% for DRLL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DRLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.