PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEMAX vs. MEIKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MEMAX vs. MEIKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MEMAX) and MFS Value Fund (MEIKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEMAX achieves a 20.53% return, which is significantly higher than MEIKX's 6.94% return. Over the past 10 years, MEMAX has underperformed MEIKX with an annualized return of 9.44%, while MEIKX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.66% annualized return.


MEMAX

1D
-0.35%
1M
4.59%
YTD
20.53%
6M
21.21%
1Y
42.78%
3Y*
22.02%
5Y*
7.08%
10Y*
9.44%

MEIKX

1D
0.38%
1M
1.71%
YTD
6.94%
6M
6.13%
1Y
15.63%
3Y*
13.86%
5Y*
8.90%
10Y*
10.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEMAX vs. MEIKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MEMAX
MFS Emerging Markets Equity Fund
20.53%33.44%10.96%10.89%-20.10%-6.98%10.17%19.81%-14.02%37.38%
MEIKX
MFS Value Fund
6.94%13.37%11.98%8.32%-5.92%25.59%4.09%30.18%-9.81%17.26%

Correlation

The correlation between MEMAX and MEIKX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2006

0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between MEMAX and MEIKX has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MEMAX vs. MEIKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEMAX
MEMAX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
MEMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
MEMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

MEIKX
MEIKX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
MEIKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEIKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEIKX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
MEIKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEIKX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEMAX vs. MEIKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MEMAX) and MFS Value Fund (MEIKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MEMAXMEIKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.27

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.47

2.46

+1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.97

8.50

+4.48

MEMAX vs. MEIKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEMAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is higher than the MEIKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEMAX and MEIKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MEMAX vs. MEIKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEMAX drawdown since its inception was -67.04%, which is greater than MEIKX's maximum drawdown of -56.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEMAX and MEIKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MEMAXMEIKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.04%

-56.81%

-10.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.27%

-6.76%

-5.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.48%

-13.15%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.88%

-17.50%

-22.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.32%

-36.68%

-5.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.51%

-1.06%

-0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.66%

-9.42%

-10.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.27%

1.95%

+1.32%

Volatility

MEMAX vs. MEIKX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MEMAX) has a higher volatility of 7.97% compared to MFS Value Fund (MEIKX) at 3.22%. This indicates that MEMAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEIKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MEMAXMEIKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.97%

3.22%

+4.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.19%

7.89%

+6.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.43%

10.66%

+5.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.32%

13.92%

+2.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.79%

16.57%

+0.22%

MEMAX vs. MEIKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEMAX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than MEIKX's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

MEMAX vs. MEIKX - Dividend Comparison

MEMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, less than MEIKX's 9.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MEIKX
MFS Value Fund
9.28%9.72%9.49%8.58%7.77%3.43%2.75%3.28%3.76%4.14%3.84%6.12%
MEMAX
MFS Emerging Markets Equity Fund
2.05%2.47%2.41%2.48%0.99%1.97%0.53%1.64%0.47%0.09%0.54%0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


MEMAX and MEIKX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MEMAX has higher volatility (7.97%) compared to MEIKX (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEMAX dropped -67.04% vs MEIKX's -56.81%.

MEMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MEMAX and MEIKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer