MEM vs. VEXC
MEM (Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF) and VEXC (Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. MEM is actively managed, while VEXC is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. MEM charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VEXC.
Performance
MEM vs. VEXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MEM achieves a 19.84% return, which is significantly higher than VEXC's 17.98% return.
MEM
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -1.66%
- 6M
- 9.62%
- YTD
- 19.84%
- 1Y
- 37.66%
- 3Y*
- 19.44%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.74%
VEXC
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -1.95%
- 6M
- 10.20%
- YTD
- 17.98%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $115.09K | $118.00K | $130.93K | |
| $2.18M | $2.18M | $2.89M |
MEM vs. VEXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MEM Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF | 19.84% | 1.69% |
VEXC Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 17.98% | 4.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between MEM and VEXC is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MEM vs. VEXC — Risk / Return Rank
MEM
VEXC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MEM vs. VEXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (MEM) and Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (VEXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MEM | VEXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.59 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.35 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MEM vs. VEXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MEM drawdown since its inception was -19.10%, which is greater than VEXC's maximum drawdown of -12.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEM and VEXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MEM | VEXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.10% | -12.42% | -6.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.45% | -5.48% | -3.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.84% | -2.62% | -2.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.13% | — | — |
Volatility
MEM vs. VEXC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MEM | VEXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.36% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.33% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.98% | 20.39% | +4.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.36% | 20.39% | -1.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.36% | 20.39% | -1.03% |
MEM vs. VEXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
MEM has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than VEXC's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
MEM vs. VEXC - Dividend Comparison
MEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, more than VEXC's 1.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEM Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF | 2.97% | 3.56% | 7.81% | 0.01% | 0.53% |
VEXC Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 1.46% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, MEM and VEXC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VEXC is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VEXC is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for MEM.
MEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.97%, compared with 1.46% for VEXC.
They also come from different issuers: Matthews and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for MEM and 0.07% for VEXC.
Find the right allocation for MEM and VEXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer