MEM vs. INDE

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

MEM (Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF) and INDE (Matthews India Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by Matthews, while INDE is a India Equities fund actively managed by Matthews. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MEM returned 37.66% vs 3.43% for INDE. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

MEM vs. INDE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (MEM) and Matthews India Active ETF (INDE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEM achieves a 19.84% return, which is significantly higher than INDE's -0.72% return.

MEM

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: -1.66%
• 6M: 9.62%
• YTD: 19.84%
• 1Y: 37.66%
• 3Y*: 19.44%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.74%

INDE

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: 0.73%
• 6M: 2.17%
• YTD: -0.72%
• 1Y: 3.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
INDE Matthews India Active ETF	$39.11K	$142.98K	$133.37K
MEM Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF	$115.09K	$118.00K	$130.93K

MEM vs. INDE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MEM Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF	19.84%	28.31%	10.11%	6.60%
INDE Matthews India Active ETF	-0.72%	2.39%	10.95%	7.84%

Correlation

The correlation between MEM and INDE is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2023	0.43

MEM vs. INDE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MEM	INDE
Technology	45.6%	5.0%
Financial Services	23.8%	30.8%
Industrials	7.8%	8.5%
Basic Materials	7.7%	3.5%
Consumer Cyclical	6.8%	8.9%
Communication Services	4.3%	11.3%
Energy	2.0%	3.0%
Consumer Defensive	1.4%	7.9%
Healthcare	0.6%	7.5%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

MEM vs. INDE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MEM

MEM Risk / Return Rank: 60
MEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
MEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
MEM Omega Ratio Rank: 59
MEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
MEM Martin Ratio Rank: 58

INDE

INDE Risk / Return Rank: 14
INDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
INDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
INDE Omega Ratio Rank: 14
INDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
INDE Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MEM vs. INDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (MEM) and Matthews India Active ETF (INDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MEM	INDE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	0.20	+1.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.08	0.42	+1.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.05	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.59	0.18	+2.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.35	0.46	+6.90

MEM vs. INDE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is higher than the INDE Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEM and INDE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MEM vs. INDE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEM drawdown since its inception was -19.10%, smaller than the maximum INDE drawdown of -22.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEM and INDE.

Drawdown Indicators

	MEM	INDE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.10%	-22.89%	+3.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.62%	-19.10%	+4.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.10%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.45%	-8.06%	-1.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.84%	-7.69%	+2.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.13%	7.53%	-2.40%

Volatility

MEM vs. INDE - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (MEM) has a higher volatility of 8.36% compared to Matthews India Active ETF (INDE) at 4.66%. This indicates that MEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MEM	INDE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.36%	4.66%	+3.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.33%	14.92%	+7.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.98%	17.47%	+7.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.36%	16.55%	+2.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.36%	16.55%	+2.81%

MEM vs. INDE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MEM and INDE have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

MEM vs. INDE - Dividend Comparison

MEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, more than INDE's 1.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
INDE Matthews India Active ETF	1.77%	1.75%	0.56%	0.00%	0.00%
MEM Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF	2.97%	3.56%	7.81%	0.01%	0.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MEM and INDE in my portfolio?

MEM and INDE have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MEM or INDE?

MEM has higher volatility (8.36%) compared to INDE (4.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEM dropped -19.10% vs INDE's -22.89%.

Which ETF is better, MEM or INDE?

On 1-year performance, MEM leads with 37.66% vs 3.43% for INDE. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, INDE has been the lower-risk option at 4.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MEM or INDE?

Over the 1-year period, MEM has performed better with a 37.66% return vs 3.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MEM or INDE?

MEM and INDE have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MEM or INDE?

MEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.97%, compared with 1.77% for INDE.

What is the main difference between MEM and INDE?

MEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while INDE is India Equities.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.