PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEM vs. INDE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MEM vs. INDE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (MEM) and Matthews India Active ETF (INDE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MEM vs. INDE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
MEM
Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF
4.61%28.31%10.11%6.44%
INDE
Matthews India Active ETF
-13.87%2.39%10.95%8.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEM achieves a 4.61% return, which is significantly higher than INDE's -13.87% return.


MEM

1D
0.86%
1M
-8.14%
YTD
4.61%
6M
6.38%
1Y
31.93%
3Y*
15.63%
5Y*
10Y*

INDE

1D
-0.05%
1M
-8.07%
YTD
-13.87%
6M
-11.36%
1Y
-3.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MEM vs. INDE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MEM and INDE have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Return for Risk

MEM vs. INDE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEM
MEM Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
MEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
MEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

INDE
INDE Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
INDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
INDE Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
INDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
INDE Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEM vs. INDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (MEM) and Matthews India Active ETF (INDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MEMINDEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.60

-0.22

+1.83

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.20

-0.20

+2.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

0.98

+0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

-0.25

+2.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.44

-0.91

+9.36

MEM vs. INDE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is higher than the INDE Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEM and INDE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MEMINDEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

-0.22

+1.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.14

+0.73

Correlation

The correlation between MEM and INDE is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

MEM vs. INDE - Dividend Comparison

MEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, more than INDE's 2.04% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
MEM
Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF
3.40%3.56%7.81%0.01%0.53%
INDE
Matthews India Active ETF
2.04%1.75%0.56%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MEM vs. INDE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEM drawdown since its inception was -19.10%, smaller than the maximum INDE drawdown of -22.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEM and INDE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MEMINDEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.10%

-22.89%

+3.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.62%

-19.10%

+4.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.95%

-20.24%

+9.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.83%

-6.96%

+2.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.85%

5.23%

-1.38%

Volatility

MEM vs. INDE - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (MEM) has a higher volatility of 9.12% compared to Matthews India Active ETF (INDE) at 7.83%. This indicates that MEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MEMINDEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.12%

7.83%

+1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.31%

12.19%

+3.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.99%

16.60%

+3.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.62%

16.05%

+1.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.62%

16.05%

+1.57%