MELIX vs. FSSAX
MELIX (Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Emerging Markets Leaders Portfolio) and FSSAX (Franklin Small Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - MELIX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by T. Rowe Price, while FSSAX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Franklin Templeton. Over the past 10 years, MELIX returned 7.96%/yr vs 12.17%/yr for FSSAX. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MELIX charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for FSSAX.
Performance
MELIX vs. FSSAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MELIX achieves a 12.95% return, which is significantly higher than FSSAX's 9.64% return. Over the past 10 years, MELIX has underperformed FSSAX with an annualized return of 7.96%, while FSSAX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.17% annualized return.
MELIX
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 5.78%
- YTD
- 12.95%
- 6M
- 11.55%
- 1Y
- 19.24%
- 3Y*
- 10.93%
- 5Y*
- -1.47%
- 10Y*
- 7.96%
FSSAX
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 3.00%
- YTD
- 9.64%
- 6M
- 9.93%
- 1Y
- 25.26%
- 3Y*
- 16.26%
- 5Y*
- 2.84%
- 10Y*
- 12.17%
MELIX vs. FSSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MELIX Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Emerging Markets Leaders Portfolio | 12.95% | 10.61% | 2.24% | 12.17% | -33.49% | 1.84% | 59.43% | 31.26% | -14.12% | 26.01% |
FSSAX Franklin Small Cap Growth Fund | 9.64% | 7.88% | 13.02% | 31.05% | -30.29% | -0.24% | 41.68% | 42.14% | -3.08% | 21.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between MELIX and FSSAX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2015 | 0.62 |
The correlation between MELIX and FSSAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MELIX vs. FSSAX — Risk / Return Rank
MELIX
FSSAX
MELIX vs. FSSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Emerging Markets Leaders Portfolio (MELIX) and Franklin Small Cap Growth Fund (FSSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MELIX | FSSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.25 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | 2.27 | -1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.52 | 8.65 | -4.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MELIX | FSSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 1.46 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 | 0.12 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.51 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.35 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
MELIX vs. FSSAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MELIX drawdown since its inception was -46.84%, smaller than the maximum FSSAX drawdown of -59.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MELIX and FSSAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MELIX | FSSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.84% | -59.61% | +12.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.14% | -11.99% | -3.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.85% | -29.48% | +7.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.63% | -42.58% | -2.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.84% | -42.80% | -4.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.30% | -0.27% | -18.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.86% | -14.74% | -3.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.16% | 3.14% | +1.02% |
Volatility
MELIX vs. FSSAX - Volatility Comparison
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Emerging Markets Leaders Portfolio (MELIX) has a higher volatility of 6.40% compared to Franklin Small Cap Growth Fund (FSSAX) at 4.72%. This indicates that MELIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MELIX | FSSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.40% | 4.72% | +1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.63% | 13.64% | +1.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.55% | 18.59% | -1.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.55% | 24.34% | -4.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.64% | 23.95% | -4.31% |
MELIX vs. FSSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MELIX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FSSAX's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
MELIX vs. FSSAX - Dividend Comparison
MELIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FSSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.97%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSSAX Franklin Small Cap Growth Fund | 6.97% | 7.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.54% | 16.49% | 9.31% | 12.17% | 22.72% | 1.77% | 0.00% | 1.92% |
MELIX Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Emerging Markets Leaders Portfolio | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 4.04% | 6.90% | 0.47% | 0.97% | 0.12% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MELIX and FSSAX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MELIX has higher volatility (6.40%) compared to FSSAX (4.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MELIX dropped -46.84% vs FSSAX's -59.61%.
FSSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MELIX and FSSAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer