PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEIKX vs. VALAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MEIKX vs. VALAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Value Fund (MEIKX) and Al Frank Fund (VALAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEIKX achieves a 4.52% return, which is significantly lower than VALAX's 23.13% return. Over the past 10 years, MEIKX has underperformed VALAX with an annualized return of 10.06%, while VALAX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.40% annualized return.


MEIKX

1D
0.60%
1M
0.43%
YTD
4.52%
6M
5.90%
1Y
13.08%
3Y*
13.32%
5Y*
7.88%
10Y*
10.06%

VALAX

1D
1.32%
1M
7.50%
YTD
23.13%
6M
24.47%
1Y
52.39%
3Y*
24.89%
5Y*
11.74%
10Y*
14.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEIKX vs. VALAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MEIKX
MFS Value Fund
4.52%13.37%11.98%8.32%-5.92%25.59%4.09%30.18%-9.81%17.26%
VALAX
Al Frank Fund
23.13%23.57%13.35%14.05%-13.50%24.97%10.22%33.98%-7.87%18.09%

Correlation

The correlation between MEIKX and VALAX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2006

0.91

The correlation between MEIKX and VALAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MEIKX vs. VALAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEIKX
MEIKX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
MEIKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEIKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEIKX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
MEIKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEIKX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

VALAX
VALAX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
VALAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VALAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
VALAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
VALAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
VALAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEIKX vs. VALAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Value Fund (MEIKX) and Al Frank Fund (VALAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MEIKXVALAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.70

-0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

6.32

-4.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.87

25.24

-18.36

MEIKX vs. VALAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEIKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is lower than the VALAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEIKX and VALAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MEIKXVALAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.29

3.96

-2.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.66

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.75

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.44

-0.04

Drawdowns

MEIKX vs. VALAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEIKX drawdown since its inception was -56.81%, smaller than the maximum VALAX drawdown of -61.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEIKX and VALAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MEIKXVALAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.81%

-61.26%

+4.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.76%

-8.56%

+1.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.15%

-25.81%

+12.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.50%

-25.81%

+8.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.68%

-38.22%

+1.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.80%

0.00%

-1.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.45%

-10.75%

+1.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

2.14%

-0.19%

Volatility

MEIKX vs. VALAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Value Fund (MEIKX) is 2.35%, while Al Frank Fund (VALAX) has a volatility of 4.18%. This indicates that MEIKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VALAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MEIKXVALAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.35%

4.18%

-1.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.75%

10.72%

-2.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.37%

13.67%

-3.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.91%

17.78%

-3.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.55%

19.34%

-2.79%

MEIKX vs. VALAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEIKX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than VALAX's 1.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

MEIKX vs. VALAX - Dividend Comparison

MEIKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.50%, more than VALAX's 7.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MEIKX
MFS Value Fund
9.50%9.72%9.49%8.58%7.77%3.43%2.75%3.28%3.76%4.14%3.84%6.12%
VALAX
Al Frank Fund
7.03%8.65%10.32%5.95%8.62%6.83%7.17%13.51%10.73%10.66%5.32%9.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


MEIKX and VALAX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VALAX has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to MEIKX (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEIKX dropped -56.81% vs VALAX's -61.26%.

VALAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.96 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MEIKX and VALAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer