PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEIKX vs. MFEKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MEIKX vs. MFEKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Value Fund (MEIKX) and MFS Growth R6 (MFEKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEIKX achieves a 4.52% return, which is significantly lower than MFEKX's 6.33% return. Over the past 10 years, MEIKX has underperformed MFEKX with an annualized return of 10.06%, while MFEKX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.77% annualized return.


MEIKX

1D
0.60%
1M
0.43%
YTD
4.52%
6M
5.90%
1Y
13.08%
3Y*
13.32%
5Y*
7.88%
10Y*
10.06%

MFEKX

1D
-0.34%
1M
4.76%
YTD
6.33%
6M
6.01%
1Y
17.76%
3Y*
26.68%
5Y*
14.46%
10Y*
17.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEIKX vs. MFEKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MEIKX
MFS Value Fund
4.52%13.37%11.98%8.32%-5.92%25.59%4.09%30.18%-9.81%17.26%
MFEKX
MFS Growth R6
6.33%12.44%49.62%36.27%-31.07%23.71%31.77%37.82%2.40%30.97%

Correlation

The correlation between MEIKX and MFEKX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2011

0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between MEIKX and MFEKX has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MEIKX vs. MFEKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEIKX
MEIKX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
MEIKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEIKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEIKX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
MEIKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEIKX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

MFEKX
MFEKX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
MFEKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFEKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFEKX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
MFEKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFEKX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEIKX vs. MFEKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Value Fund (MEIKX) and MFS Growth R6 (MFEKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MEIKXMFEKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.21

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

1.06

+0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.87

3.46

+3.42

MEIKX vs. MFEKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEIKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the MFEKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEIKX and MFEKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MEIKXMFEKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.29

1.16

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.66

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.84

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.87

-0.47

Drawdowns

MEIKX vs. MFEKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEIKX drawdown since its inception was -56.81%, which is greater than MFEKX's maximum drawdown of -36.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEIKX and MFEKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MEIKXMFEKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.81%

-36.06%

-20.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.76%

-17.27%

+10.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.15%

-23.22%

+10.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.50%

-36.06%

+18.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.68%

-36.06%

-0.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.80%

-0.34%

-1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.45%

-5.64%

-3.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

5.30%

-3.35%

Volatility

MEIKX vs. MFEKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Value Fund (MEIKX) is 2.35%, while MFS Growth R6 (MFEKX) has a volatility of 3.59%. This indicates that MEIKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFEKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MEIKXMFEKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.35%

3.59%

-1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.75%

12.24%

-4.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.37%

15.83%

-5.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.91%

21.89%

-7.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.55%

21.20%

-4.65%

MEIKX vs. MFEKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEIKX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than MFEKX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

MEIKX vs. MFEKX - Dividend Comparison

MEIKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.50%, less than MFEKX's 13.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MEIKX
MFS Value Fund
9.50%9.72%9.49%8.58%7.77%3.43%2.75%3.28%3.76%4.14%3.84%6.12%
MFEKX
MFS Growth R6
13.94%14.82%25.31%4.82%1.04%2.74%3.55%1.57%3.88%2.49%1.70%3.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


MEIKX and MFEKX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFEKX has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to MEIKX (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEIKX dropped -56.81% vs MFEKX's -36.06%.

MEIKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MEIKX and MFEKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer