PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEIIX vs. MFEKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MEIIX vs. MFEKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Value Fund Class I (MEIIX) and MFS Growth R6 (MFEKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEIIX achieves a 3.85% return, which is significantly lower than MFEKX's 6.70% return. Over the past 10 years, MEIIX has underperformed MFEKX with an annualized return of 9.79%, while MFEKX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.81% annualized return.


MEIIX

1D
-0.65%
1M
-0.99%
YTD
3.85%
6M
6.13%
1Y
12.56%
3Y*
12.98%
5Y*
7.63%
10Y*
9.79%

MFEKX

1D
1.14%
1M
4.91%
YTD
6.70%
6M
5.85%
1Y
18.67%
3Y*
26.82%
5Y*
14.37%
10Y*
17.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEIIX vs. MFEKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MEIIX
MFS Value Fund Class I
3.85%13.26%11.86%8.21%-6.02%25.43%3.99%30.04%-9.90%17.20%
MFEKX
MFS Growth R6
6.70%12.44%49.62%36.27%-31.07%23.71%31.77%37.82%2.40%30.97%

Correlation

The correlation between MEIIX and MFEKX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2011

0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between MEIIX and MFEKX has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MEIIX vs. MFEKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEIIX
MEIIX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
MEIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
MEIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

MFEKX
MFEKX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
MFEKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFEKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFEKX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
MFEKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFEKX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEIIX vs. MFEKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Value Fund Class I (MEIIX) and MFS Growth R6 (MFEKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MEIIXMFEKXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.23

1.23

0.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.79

1.73

+0.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.22

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

1.14

+0.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.68

3.70

+2.98

MEIIX vs. MFEKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEIIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is comparable to the MFEKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEIIX and MFEKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MEIIXMFEKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

1.23

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.66

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.84

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.87

-0.31

Drawdowns

MEIIX vs. MFEKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEIIX drawdown since its inception was -52.64%, which is greater than MFEKX's maximum drawdown of -36.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEIIX and MFEKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MEIIXMFEKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.64%

-36.06%

-16.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.76%

-17.27%

+10.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.19%

-23.22%

+10.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.58%

-36.06%

+18.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.70%

-36.06%

-0.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.41%

0.00%

-2.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.55%

-5.64%

-0.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

5.30%

-3.35%

Volatility

MEIIX vs. MFEKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Value Fund Class I (MEIIX) is 2.39%, while MFS Growth R6 (MFEKX) has a volatility of 3.54%. This indicates that MEIIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFEKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MEIIXMFEKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.39%

3.54%

-1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.75%

12.25%

-4.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.38%

15.86%

-5.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.92%

21.89%

-7.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.55%

21.20%

-4.65%

MEIIX vs. MFEKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEIIX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than MFEKX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

MEIIX vs. MFEKX - Dividend Comparison

MEIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.36%, less than MFEKX's 13.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MEIIX
MFS Value Fund Class I
9.36%9.52%9.30%8.41%7.58%3.32%2.63%3.17%3.62%4.04%2.91%5.97%
MFEKX
MFS Growth R6
13.89%14.82%25.31%4.82%1.04%2.74%3.55%1.57%3.88%2.49%1.70%3.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


MEIIX and MFEKX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFEKX has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to MEIIX (2.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEIIX dropped -52.64% vs MFEKX's -36.06%.

MFEKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MEIIX and MFEKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer