MEIFX vs. ILGCX
MEIFX (Meridian Enhanced Equity Fund) and ILGCX (Columbia Integrated Large Cap Growth Fund Class A) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MEIFX charges 1.20%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for ILGCX.
Performance
MEIFX vs. ILGCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MEIFX
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- 1.63%
- YTD
- 4.66%
- 6M
- 5.62%
- 1Y
- 8.51%
- 3Y*
- 11.49%
- 5Y*
- 6.46%
- 10Y*
- 14.03%
ILGCX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MEIFX vs. ILGCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEIFX Meridian Enhanced Equity Fund | 4.66% | 6.51% | 13.19% | 18.96% | -14.82% |
ILGCX Columbia Integrated Large Cap Growth Fund Class A | -8.30% | 14.93% | 31.88% | 41.54% | -20.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between MEIFX and ILGCX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2022 | 0.66 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MEIFX and ILGCX has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MEIFX vs. ILGCX — Risk / Return Rank
MEIFX
ILGCX
MEIFX vs. ILGCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meridian Enhanced Equity Fund (MEIFX) and Columbia Integrated Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (ILGCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MEIFX | ILGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.26 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MEIFX | ILGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | — | — |
Drawdowns
MEIFX vs. ILGCX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MEIFX | ILGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.54% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.53% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.72% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.48% | — | — |
Volatility
MEIFX vs. ILGCX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MEIFX | ILGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.73% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.41% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.35% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.91% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.95% | — | — |
MEIFX vs. ILGCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MEIFX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ILGCX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
MEIFX vs. ILGCX - Dividend Comparison
MEIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.92%, less than ILGCX's 151.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILGCX Columbia Integrated Large Cap Growth Fund Class A | 151.73% | 38.35% | 13.20% | 0.02% | 33.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MEIFX Meridian Enhanced Equity Fund | 6.92% | 7.25% | 14.61% | 0.61% | 9.28% | 25.44% | 13.26% | 40.49% | 11.67% | 1.18% | 0.78% | 4.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MEIFX and ILGCX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for MEIFX and ILGCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer