MEFOX vs. RESGX

Last updated Jul 31, 2026

MEFOX (Meehan Focus Fund) and RESGX (Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, MEFOX returned 16.33%/yr vs 12.03%/yr for RESGX. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. MEFOX charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for RESGX.

Performance

MEFOX vs. RESGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Meehan Focus Fund (MEFOX) and Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEFOX achieves a 9.78% return, which is significantly lower than RESGX's 20.62% return. Over the past 10 years, MEFOX has outperformed RESGX with an annualized return of 16.33%, while RESGX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.03% annualized return.

MEFOX

• 1D: -1.83%
• 1M: -3.96%
• 6M: 7.31%
• YTD: 9.78%
• 1Y: 19.53%
• 3Y*: 21.76%
• 5Y*: 14.79%
• 10Y*: 16.33%
• ALL TIME*: 7.95%

RESGX

• 1D: -1.33%
• 1M: -3.45%
• 6M: 14.37%
• YTD: 20.62%
• 1Y: 29.65%
• 3Y*: 15.52%
• 5Y*: 8.90%
• 10Y*: 12.03%
• ALL TIME*: 12.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MEFOX Meehan Focus Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
RESGX Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

MEFOX vs. RESGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MEFOX Meehan Focus Fund	9.78%	21.08%	26.12%	35.45%	-20.75%	35.58%	20.45%	33.19%	-7.53%	21.89%
RESGX Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio	20.62%	10.30%	11.40%	15.59%	-14.71%	26.58%	9.57%	24.25%	-6.47%	22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between MEFOX and RESGX is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.84
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between MEFOX and RESGX has dropped to 0.63 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

MEFOX vs. RESGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MEFOX

MEFOX Risk / Return Rank: 50
MEFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
MEFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
MEFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
MEFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
MEFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 61

RESGX

RESGX Risk / Return Rank: 84
RESGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
RESGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
RESGX Omega Ratio Rank: 76
RESGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
RESGX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MEFOX vs. RESGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meehan Focus Fund (MEFOX) and Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MEFOX	RESGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.29	1.96	-0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.85	2.77	-0.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.34	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.82	3.73	-1.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.70	11.82	-4.12

MEFOX vs. RESGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEFOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is lower than the RESGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEFOX and RESGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MEFOX vs. RESGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEFOX drawdown since its inception was -54.83%, which is greater than RESGX's maximum drawdown of -37.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEFOX and RESGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MEFOX	RESGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.83%	-37.80%	-17.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.88%	-7.84%	-3.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.12%	-20.50%	+0.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.19%	-23.58%	-2.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.38%	-37.80%	+1.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.96%	-5.70%	+1.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.07%	-4.98%	-4.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.56%	2.49%	+0.07%

Volatility

MEFOX vs. RESGX - Volatility Comparison

Meehan Focus Fund (MEFOX) has a higher volatility of 3.87% compared to Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX) at 3.31%. This indicates that MEFOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RESGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MEFOX	RESGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.87%	3.31%	+0.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.84%	11.26%	+0.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.29%	14.93%	+0.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.78%	17.31%	+1.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.60%	18.65%	+0.95%

MEFOX vs. RESGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEFOX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than RESGX's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

MEFOX vs. RESGX - Dividend Comparison

MEFOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than RESGX's 7.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
MEFOX Meehan Focus Fund	0.15%	0.16%	0.94%	0.37%	0.80%	3.55%	1.09%	3.55%	2.84%	0.57%	0.37%
RESGX Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio	7.07%	8.24%	13.38%	9.08%	8.17%	9.98%	0.82%	1.90%	5.09%	0.94%	0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MEFOX and RESGX in my portfolio?

MEFOX and RESGX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MEFOX or RESGX?

MEFOX has higher volatility (3.87%) compared to RESGX (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEFOX dropped -54.83% vs RESGX's -37.80%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RESGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.