MEDX vs. NVIR

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF (MEDX) and Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF (NVIR).

MEDX and NVIR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MEDX is an actively managed fund by Horizon. It was launched on Sep 30, 1999. NVIR is an actively managed fund by Horizon. It was launched on Feb 21, 2023.

Performance

MEDX vs. NVIR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF (MEDX) and Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF (NVIR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MEDX vs. NVIR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MEDX Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF	1.52%	28.62%	-4.68%	-3.21%
NVIR Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF	19.55%	9.84%	17.53%	6.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEDX achieves a 1.52% return, which is significantly lower than NVIR's 19.55% return.

MEDX

• 1D: 1.19%
• 1M: -3.98%
• YTD: 1.52%
• 6M: 8.07%
• 1Y: 27.44%
• 3Y*: 6.83%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NVIR

• 1D: -2.96%
• 1M: -1.80%
• YTD: 19.55%
• 6M: 20.43%
• 1Y: 28.28%
• 3Y*: 18.94%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEDX vs. NVIR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MEDX and NVIR have an expense ratio of 0.85%.

MEDX

Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF

NVIR

Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF

Return for Risk

MEDX vs. NVIR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEDX

MEDX Risk / Return Rank: 68
MEDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
MEDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
MEDX Omega Ratio Rank: 61
MEDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
MEDX Martin Ratio Rank: 63

NVIR

NVIR Risk / Return Rank: 65
NVIR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
NVIR Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
NVIR Omega Ratio Rank: 70
NVIR Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
NVIR Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEDX vs. NVIR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF (MEDX) and Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF (NVIR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MEDX	NVIR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.30	1.28	+0.02
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.87	1.69	+0.18
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.28	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.15	1.67	+0.48
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.85	7.18	-0.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MEDX vs. NVIR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the NVIR Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEDX and NVIR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MEDX	NVIR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.30	1.28	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.91	-0.61

Correlation

The correlation between MEDX and NVIR is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MEDX vs. NVIR - Dividend Comparison

MEDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, more than NVIR's 0.77% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
MEDX Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF	1.21%	1.23%	1.92%	4.94%
NVIR Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF	0.77%	0.92%	1.50%	1.34%

Drawdowns

MEDX vs. NVIR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEDX drawdown since its inception was -23.10%, roughly equal to the maximum NVIR drawdown of -22.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEDX and NVIR.

Drawdown Indicators

	MEDX	NVIR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.10%	-22.47%	-0.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.86%	-17.59%	+6.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.91%	-5.16%	+0.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.72%	-4.62%	-2.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.40%	4.09%	-0.69%

Volatility

MEDX vs. NVIR - Volatility Comparison

Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF (MEDX) has a higher volatility of 6.14% compared to Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF (NVIR) at 4.94%. This indicates that MEDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVIR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MEDX	NVIR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.14%	4.94%	+1.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.42%	12.09%	+1.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.48%	22.25%	-0.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.92%	19.33%	-2.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.92%	19.33%	-2.41%