MDWD vs. REMX
MDWD (MediWound Ltd.) is a stock, while REMX (VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF) is Materials fund tracking the MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. Over the past 10 years, MDWD returned -13.00%/yr vs 9.67%/yr for REMX. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MDWD vs. REMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDWD achieves a -25.62% return, which is significantly lower than REMX's 31.22% return. Over the past 10 years, MDWD has underperformed REMX with an annualized return of -13.00%, while REMX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.67% annualized return.
MDWD
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -20.45%
- YTD
- -25.62%
- 6M
- -22.47%
- 1Y
- -36.41%
- 3Y*
- 15.50%
- 5Y*
- -10.58%
- 10Y*
- -13.00%
REMX
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- -6.58%
- YTD
- 31.22%
- 6M
- 39.17%
- 1Y
- 160.26%
- 3Y*
- 6.64%
- 5Y*
- 4.22%
- 10Y*
- 9.67%
MDWD vs. REMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDWD MediWound Ltd. | -25.62% | 3.71% | 75.02% | -24.61% | -18.34% | -36.22% | 19.35% | -23.65% | -8.76% | -2.82% |
REMX VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF | 31.22% | 92.95% | -35.02% | -19.18% | -31.13% | 79.81% | 64.82% | 0.74% | -49.63% | 82.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDWD and REMX is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2014 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDWD vs. REMX — Risk / Return Rank
MDWD
REMX
MDWD vs. REMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MediWound Ltd. (MDWD) and VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MDWD | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.44 | -0.58 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | 6.91 | -7.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.98 | 19.75 | -21.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MDWD | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.88 | 3.36 | -4.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 | 0.11 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.21 | 0.26 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.27 | -0.08 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
MDWD vs. REMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDWD drawdown since its inception was -94.35%, roughly equal to the maximum REMX drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDWD and REMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDWD | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.35% | -90.20% | -4.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.73% | -23.35% | -13.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.26% | -62.11% | +23.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.04% | -73.34% | -8.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -87.76% | -73.34% | -14.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.20% | -55.58% | -33.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.87% | -66.86% | -9.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.42% | 8.15% | +10.27% |
Volatility
MDWD vs. REMX - Volatility Comparison
MediWound Ltd. (MDWD) has a higher volatility of 16.88% compared to VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) at 12.92%. This indicates that MDWD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDWD | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.88% | 12.92% | +3.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.96% | 34.80% | -3.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.72% | 48.11% | -6.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.09% | 40.23% | +20.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.81% | 36.93% | +23.88% |
Dividends
MDWD vs. REMX - Dividend Comparison
MDWD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while REMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDWD MediWound Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
REMX VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF | 1.34% | 1.76% | 2.56% | 0.00% | 1.56% | 5.25% | 0.81% | 1.64% | 12.43% | 2.89% | 2.23% | 4.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MDWD and REMX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MDWD has higher volatility (16.88%) compared to REMX (12.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDWD dropped -94.35% vs REMX's -90.20%.
REMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.36 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDWD and REMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer