MDST vs. PBOG
MDST (Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF) and PBOG (Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MDST is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Westwood, while PBOG is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the BITA Global Oil & Gas Select Index. MDST is actively managed, while PBOG is passively managed. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MDST charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for PBOG.
Performance
MDST vs. PBOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDST achieves a 14.94% return, which is significantly lower than PBOG's 32.22% return.
MDST
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -0.74%
- YTD
- 14.94%
- 6M
- 14.77%
- 1Y
- 17.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBOG
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- -2.32%
- YTD
- 32.22%
- 6M
- 29.70%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MDST vs. PBOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MDST Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF | 14.94% | 1.99% |
PBOG Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF | 32.22% | 1.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDST and PBOG is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2025 | 0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDST vs. PBOG — Risk / Return Rank
MDST
PBOG
MDST vs. PBOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF (MDST) and Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF (PBOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MDST | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.46 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MDST | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.16 | 3.31 | -2.15 |
Drawdowns
MDST vs. PBOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDST drawdown since its inception was -14.19%, which is greater than PBOG's maximum drawdown of -11.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDST and PBOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDST | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.19% | -11.45% | -2.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.53% | -6.81% | +3.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.17% | -3.10% | +0.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.37% | — | — |
Volatility
MDST vs. PBOG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDST | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.87% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.36% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.12% | 23.67% | -11.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.11% | 23.67% | -7.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.11% | 23.67% | -7.56% |
MDST vs. PBOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDST has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than PBOG's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
MDST vs. PBOG - Dividend Comparison
MDST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.33%, more than PBOG's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MDST Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF | 9.33% | 10.22% | 6.60% |
PBOG Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MDST and PBOG have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBOG is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBOG is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for MDST.
MDST has the higher dividend yield at 9.33%, compared with 0.13% for PBOG.
MDST is categorized as Energy Equities, while PBOG is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Westwood and Portfolio Building Blocks. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for MDST and 0.13% for PBOG.
Find the right allocation for MDST and PBOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer