PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDSIX vs. PEDIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDSIX vs. PEDIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Integrity Short Term Government Fund (MDSIX) and PIMCO Extended Duration Fund (PEDIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDSIX achieves a 2.22% return, which is significantly lower than PEDIX's 3.26% return. Over the past 10 years, MDSIX has outperformed PEDIX with an annualized return of 2.02%, while PEDIX has yielded a comparatively lower -2.86% annualized return.


MDSIX

1D
0.33%
1M
1.07%
YTD
2.22%
6M
2.13%
1Y
5.82%
3Y*
6.16%
5Y*
2.32%
10Y*
2.02%

PEDIX

1D
2.23%
1M
5.34%
YTD
3.26%
6M
2.08%
1Y
6.48%
3Y*
-3.52%
5Y*
-9.36%
10Y*
-2.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDSIX vs. PEDIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDSIX
Integrity Short Term Government Fund
2.22%6.91%6.90%4.30%-7.23%-1.14%2.76%3.54%2.21%1.19%
PEDIX
PIMCO Extended Duration Fund
3.26%3.01%-12.61%2.71%-40.33%-5.54%24.68%18.66%-4.01%13.85%

Correlation

The correlation between MDSIX and PEDIX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2011

0.52

The correlation between MDSIX and PEDIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (all time) to 0.70 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDSIX vs. PEDIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDSIX
MDSIX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
MDSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
MDSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

PEDIX
PEDIX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
PEDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
PEDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDSIX vs. PEDIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Integrity Short Term Government Fund (MDSIX) and PIMCO Extended Duration Fund (PEDIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MDSIXPEDIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.09

+0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.79

0.54

+4.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.49

1.26

+18.23

MDSIX vs. PEDIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDSIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is higher than the PEDIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDSIX and PEDIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MDSIX vs. PEDIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDSIX drawdown since its inception was -11.28%, smaller than the maximum PEDIX drawdown of -60.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDSIX and PEDIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDSIXPEDIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.28%

-60.38%

+49.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.22%

-12.59%

+11.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.60%

-26.92%

+24.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.08%

-56.15%

+45.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.28%

-60.38%

+49.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-51.49%

+51.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.25%

-21.29%

+20.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.30%

5.36%

-5.06%

Volatility

MDSIX vs. PEDIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Integrity Short Term Government Fund (MDSIX) is 0.61%, while PIMCO Extended Duration Fund (PEDIX) has a volatility of 4.02%. This indicates that MDSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PEDIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDSIXPEDIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.61%

4.02%

-3.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.86%

10.86%

-9.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40%

15.07%

-12.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.35%

22.13%

-18.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.16%

20.54%

-17.38%

MDSIX vs. PEDIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDSIX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than PEDIX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

MDSIX vs. PEDIX - Dividend Comparison

MDSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, less than PEDIX's 3.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDSIX
Integrity Short Term Government Fund
3.26%2.54%3.91%1.51%0.93%1.90%4.41%3.50%3.70%3.01%2.50%2.44%
PEDIX
PIMCO Extended Duration Fund
3.65%3.41%1.86%4.59%3.02%27.69%22.31%2.35%3.91%4.00%8.05%4.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDSIX and PEDIX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PEDIX has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to MDSIX (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDSIX dropped -11.28% vs PEDIX's -60.38%.

MDSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDSIX and PEDIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer