MDOEX vs. PDEZX
MDOEX (Morgan Stanley Developing Opportunity Portfolio) and PDEZX (PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Equity Opportunities Fund) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, MDOEX returned -0.54%/yr vs -1.10%/yr for PDEZX. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. MDOEX charges 1.15%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for PDEZX.
Performance
MDOEX vs. PDEZX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MDOEX having a 11.78% return and PDEZX slightly lower at 11.29%.
MDOEX
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- 0.92%
- 6M
- 9.35%
- YTD
- 11.78%
- 1Y
- 11.37%
- 3Y*
- 10.80%
- 5Y*
- -0.54%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.16%
PDEZX
- 1D
- 2.53%
- 1M
- -9.58%
- 6M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 11.29%
- 1Y
- 21.46%
- 3Y*
- 18.37%
- 5Y*
- -1.10%
- 10Y*
- 9.40%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.02%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
MDOEX vs. PDEZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDOEX Morgan Stanley Developing Opportunity Portfolio | 11.78% | 8.28% | 16.79% | 5.36% | -30.36% | -18.69% | 45.00% |
PDEZX PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Equity Opportunities Fund | 11.29% | 14.88% | 18.48% | 16.12% | -41.65% | -0.86% | 62.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDOEX and PDEZX is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2020 | 0.87 |
The correlation between MDOEX and PDEZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDOEX vs. PDEZX — Risk / Return Rank
MDOEX
PDEZX
MDOEX vs. PDEZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Developing Opportunity Portfolio (MDOEX) and PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Equity Opportunities Fund (PDEZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MDOEX | PDEZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.14 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.44 | 0.77 | -0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.17 | 2.96 | -1.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MDOEX vs. PDEZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDOEX drawdown since its inception was -59.92%, which is greater than PDEZX's maximum drawdown of -54.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDOEX and PDEZX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDOEX | PDEZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.92% | -54.95% | -4.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.82% | -24.82% | +3.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.82% | -24.82% | +3.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.32% | -52.34% | +4.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -54.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.28% | -18.90% | -10.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.88% | -20.10% | -14.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.25% | 6.44% | +1.81% |
Volatility
MDOEX vs. PDEZX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Morgan Stanley Developing Opportunity Portfolio (MDOEX) is 8.92%, while PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Equity Opportunities Fund (PDEZX) has a volatility of 15.34%. This indicates that MDOEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDEZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDOEX | PDEZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.92% | 15.34% | -6.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.83% | 28.53% | -4.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.01% | 31.05% | -5.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.20% | 25.05% | -0.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.19% | 23.12% | +2.07% |
MDOEX vs. PDEZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDOEX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than PDEZX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
MDOEX vs. PDEZX - Dividend Comparison
MDOEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than PDEZX's 1.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MDOEX Morgan Stanley Developing Opportunity Portfolio | 0.66% | 0.74% | 0.76% |
PDEZX PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Equity Opportunities Fund | 1.98% | 2.21% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MDOEX and PDEZX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PDEZX has higher volatility (15.34%) compared to MDOEX (8.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDOEX dropped -59.92% vs PDEZX's -54.95%.
PDEZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDOEX and PDEZX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer