PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDIJX vs. MQLFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDIJX vs. MQLFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS International Diversification Fund (MDIJX) and MFS Limited Maturity Fund (MQLFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDIJX achieves a 10.27% return, which is significantly higher than MQLFX's 0.85% return. Over the past 10 years, MDIJX has outperformed MQLFX with an annualized return of 9.90%, while MQLFX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.26% annualized return.


MDIJX

1D
0.62%
1M
4.51%
YTD
10.27%
6M
12.30%
1Y
22.89%
3Y*
16.34%
5Y*
7.22%
10Y*
9.90%

MQLFX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.85%
6M
1.07%
1Y
4.23%
3Y*
4.76%
5Y*
2.17%
10Y*
2.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDIJX vs. MQLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDIJX
MFS International Diversification Fund
10.27%27.84%6.41%14.37%-17.12%7.69%15.26%26.00%-11.05%30.29%
MQLFX
MFS Limited Maturity Fund
0.85%5.71%4.44%5.30%-4.69%-0.20%4.20%4.74%1.17%1.28%

Correlation

The correlation between MDIJX and MQLFX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2004

0.02

Over the past year, MDIJX and MQLFX have become more correlated (0.27) than their long-term average of 0.02, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDIJX vs. MQLFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDIJX
MDIJX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
MDIJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDIJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDIJX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
MDIJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDIJX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

MQLFX
MQLFX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
MQLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MQLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
MQLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
MQLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
MQLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDIJX vs. MQLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS International Diversification Fund (MDIJX) and MFS Limited Maturity Fund (MQLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MDIJXMQLFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.47

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

3.02

-1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.43

11.73

-4.30

MDIJX vs. MQLFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDIJX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the MQLFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDIJX and MQLFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDIJXMQLFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

1.84

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.91

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

1.04

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

1.54

-1.06

Drawdowns

MDIJX vs. MQLFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDIJX drawdown since its inception was -56.60%, which is greater than MQLFX's maximum drawdown of -7.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDIJX and MQLFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDIJXMQLFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.60%

-7.14%

-49.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.40%

-1.35%

-10.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.57%

-1.35%

-11.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.19%

-7.14%

-23.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.19%

-7.14%

-23.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.20%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.09%

-0.60%

-8.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

0.35%

+2.66%

Volatility

MDIJX vs. MQLFX - Volatility Comparison

MFS International Diversification Fund (MDIJX) has a higher volatility of 3.98% compared to MFS Limited Maturity Fund (MQLFX) at 0.80%. This indicates that MDIJX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MQLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDIJXMQLFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.98%

0.80%

+3.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.17%

1.62%

+8.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.51%

2.22%

+10.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.22%

2.40%

+11.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.70%

2.17%

+12.53%

MDIJX vs. MQLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDIJX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than MQLFX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

MDIJX vs. MQLFX - Dividend Comparison

MDIJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, more than MQLFX's 4.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDIJX
MFS International Diversification Fund
4.69%5.17%3.50%4.14%2.64%2.70%1.64%2.50%3.14%1.63%2.18%1.69%
MQLFX
MFS Limited Maturity Fund
4.33%4.34%3.47%2.85%1.38%1.46%2.27%2.60%2.18%1.61%1.27%1.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDIJX and MQLFX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MDIJX has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to MQLFX (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDIJX dropped -56.60% vs MQLFX's -7.14%.

MQLFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDIJX and MQLFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer