MDIJX vs. AIMOX
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS International Diversification Fund (MDIJX) and AQR International Momentum Style Fund (AIMOX).
MDIJX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Sep 30, 2004. AIMOX is managed by AQR Funds. It was launched on Jul 8, 2009.
Performance
MDIJX vs. AIMOX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MDIJX vs. AIMOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDIJX MFS International Diversification Fund | -0.22% | 27.84% | 6.41% | 14.37% | -17.12% | 7.69% | 15.26% | 26.00% | -11.05% | 30.29% |
AIMOX AQR International Momentum Style Fund | 0.06% | 34.89% | 8.70% | 16.69% | -19.43% | 12.04% | 16.57% | 22.63% | -15.29% | 25.25% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDIJX achieves a -0.22% return, which is significantly lower than AIMOX's 0.06% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MDIJX having a 9.18% annualized return and AIMOX not far behind at 8.86%.
MDIJX
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- -7.39%
- YTD
- -0.22%
- 6M
- 2.92%
- 1Y
- 19.95%
- 3Y*
- 13.01%
- 5Y*
- 6.11%
- 10Y*
- 9.18%
AIMOX
- 1D
- 3.58%
- 1M
- -6.84%
- YTD
- 0.06%
- 6M
- 3.81%
- 1Y
- 23.66%
- 3Y*
- 17.53%
- 5Y*
- 8.68%
- 10Y*
- 8.86%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MDIJX vs. AIMOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDIJX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than AIMOX's 0.57% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MDIJX vs. AIMOX — Risk / Return Rank
MDIJX
AIMOX
MDIJX vs. AIMOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS International Diversification Fund (MDIJX) and AQR International Momentum Style Fund (AIMOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MDIJX | AIMOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.48 | 1.36 | +0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.96 | 1.88 | +0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.28 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | 2.03 | -0.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.69 | 7.96 | -1.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MDIJX | AIMOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | 1.36 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.51 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.53 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.37 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between MDIJX and AIMOX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MDIJX vs. AIMOX - Dividend Comparison
MDIJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.18%, less than AIMOX's 15.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDIJX MFS International Diversification Fund | 5.18% | 5.17% | 3.50% | 4.14% | 2.64% | 2.70% | 1.64% | 2.50% | 3.14% | 1.63% | 2.18% | 1.69% |
AIMOX AQR International Momentum Style Fund | 15.19% | 15.20% | 22.64% | 13.66% | 2.77% | 2.22% | 1.12% | 2.34% | 2.17% | 2.19% | 2.52% | 1.62% |
Drawdowns
MDIJX vs. AIMOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDIJX drawdown since its inception was -56.60%, which is greater than AIMOX's maximum drawdown of -32.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDIJX and AIMOX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDIJX | AIMOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.60% | -32.23% | -24.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.40% | -11.66% | +0.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.19% | -32.23% | +2.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.19% | -32.23% | +2.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.03% | -8.50% | -0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.14% | -8.28% | -0.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 2.97% | -0.07% |
Volatility
MDIJX vs. AIMOX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MFS International Diversification Fund (MDIJX) is 6.30%, while AQR International Momentum Style Fund (AIMOX) has a volatility of 8.59%. This indicates that MDIJX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIMOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MDIJX | AIMOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.30% | 8.59% | -2.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.37% | 12.35% | -2.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.99% | 17.96% | -3.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.09% | 16.99% | -2.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.64% | 16.81% | -2.17% |