PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDIDX vs. SAHMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDIDX vs. SAHMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS International Diversification Fund Class A (MDIDX) and SA International Value Fund (SAHMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDIDX achieves a 11.20% return, which is significantly lower than SAHMX's 16.30% return. Over the past 10 years, MDIDX has underperformed SAHMX with an annualized return of 9.47%, while SAHMX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.38% annualized return.


MDIDX

1D
2.59%
1M
1.91%
6M
5.80%
YTD
11.20%
1Y
22.67%
3Y*
14.88%
5Y*
7.43%
10Y*
9.47%
ALL TIME*
8.00%

SAHMX

1D
1.60%
1M
4.58%
6M
9.89%
YTD
16.30%
1Y
36.09%
3Y*
21.59%
5Y*
15.23%
10Y*
11.38%
ALL TIME*
6.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MDIDX vs. SAHMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDIDX
MFS International Diversification Fund Class A
11.20%27.58%6.12%14.05%-17.31%7.42%14.99%25.68%-11.25%29.94%
SAHMX
SA International Value Fund
16.30%44.08%5.44%16.49%-3.70%17.59%-2.48%14.61%-17.95%25.06%

Correlation

The correlation between MDIDX and SAHMX is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2004

0.79

The correlation between MDIDX and SAHMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDIDX vs. SAHMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MDIDX
MDIDX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
MDIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
MDIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

SAHMX
SAHMX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SAHMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAHMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAHMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SAHMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAHMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MDIDX vs. SAHMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS International Diversification Fund Class A (MDIDX) and SA International Value Fund (SAHMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MDIDXSAHMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.57

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

4.39

-2.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.81

14.73

-7.92

MDIDX vs. SAHMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDIDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is lower than the SAHMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDIDX and SAHMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MDIDX vs. SAHMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDIDX drawdown since its inception was -56.80%, smaller than the maximum SAHMX drawdown of -66.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDIDX and SAHMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDIDXSAHMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.80%

-66.58%

+9.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.41%

-8.72%

-2.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.60%

-14.85%

+2.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.40%

-25.10%

-5.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.40%

-48.63%

+18.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.29%

-16.09%

+6.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

2.55%

+0.50%

Volatility

MDIDX vs. SAHMX - Volatility Comparison

MFS International Diversification Fund Class A (MDIDX) has a higher volatility of 4.14% compared to SA International Value Fund (SAHMX) at 3.47%. This indicates that MDIDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SAHMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDIDXSAHMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.14%

3.47%

+0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.68%

9.62%

+2.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.58%

12.17%

+1.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.43%

15.42%

-0.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.55%

16.06%

-1.51%

MDIDX vs. SAHMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDIDX has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is lower than SAHMX's 1.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

MDIDX vs. SAHMX - Dividend Comparison

MDIDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, less than SAHMX's 4.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDIDX
MFS International Diversification Fund Class A
4.48%4.99%3.27%3.94%2.41%2.47%1.45%2.30%2.89%1.42%1.94%1.60%
SAHMX
SA International Value Fund
4.60%5.35%3.57%3.46%4.06%3.05%2.09%3.66%1.93%2.46%2.89%1.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDIDX and SAHMX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MDIDX has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to SAHMX (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDIDX dropped -56.80% vs SAHMX's -66.58%.

SAHMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDIDX and SAHMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer