PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDFIX vs. CBLDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MDFIX vs. CBLDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matisse Discounted Bond CEF Strategy (MDFIX) and CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund (CBLDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MDFIX vs. CBLDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MDFIX
Matisse Discounted Bond CEF Strategy
-2.89%8.08%10.74%13.63%-15.84%75.03%26.79%
CBLDX
CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund
0.46%6.04%7.11%7.71%0.66%7.44%7.20%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDFIX achieves a -2.89% return, which is significantly lower than CBLDX's 0.46% return.


MDFIX

1D
0.11%
1M
-2.24%
YTD
-2.89%
6M
-2.19%
1Y
2.76%
3Y*
8.18%
5Y*
13.43%
10Y*

CBLDX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.31%
YTD
0.46%
6M
1.42%
1Y
5.06%
3Y*
6.56%
5Y*
5.12%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MDFIX vs. CBLDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDFIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than CBLDX's 0.88% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MDFIX vs. CBLDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDFIX
MDFIX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
MDFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
MDFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

CBLDX
CBLDX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
CBLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
CBLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDFIX vs. CBLDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matisse Discounted Bond CEF Strategy (MDFIX) and CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund (CBLDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MDFIXCBLDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.60

3.52

-2.92

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.80

5.05

-4.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

2.08

-0.95

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.74

5.45

-4.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.42

25.00

-22.57

MDFIX vs. CBLDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDFIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the CBLDX Sharpe Ratio of 3.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDFIX and CBLDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDFIXCBLDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

3.52

-2.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

3.27

-2.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

2.55

-1.90

Correlation

The correlation between MDFIX and CBLDX is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

MDFIX vs. CBLDX - Dividend Comparison

MDFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.71%, more than CBLDX's 6.27% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
MDFIX
Matisse Discounted Bond CEF Strategy
8.71%8.31%7.00%7.15%7.55%45.93%3.89%0.00%0.00%
CBLDX
CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund
6.27%6.43%7.12%7.65%5.07%5.13%3.97%2.85%2.18%

Drawdowns

MDFIX vs. CBLDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDFIX drawdown since its inception was -22.49%, which is greater than CBLDX's maximum drawdown of -8.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDFIX and CBLDX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MDFIXCBLDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.49%

-8.15%

-14.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.17%

-0.93%

-3.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.49%

-1.88%

-20.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.83%

-0.62%

-3.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.72%

-0.31%

-4.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.27%

0.20%

+1.07%

Volatility

MDFIX vs. CBLDX - Volatility Comparison

Matisse Discounted Bond CEF Strategy (MDFIX) has a higher volatility of 1.88% compared to CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund (CBLDX) at 0.65%. This indicates that MDFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBLDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MDFIXCBLDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.88%

0.65%

+1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.67%

1.11%

+1.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.95%

1.45%

+3.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.74%

1.57%

+26.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.63%

1.83%

+23.80%