MDDAX vs. AUXFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MDDAX (MassMutual Diversified Value Fund) and AUXFX (Auxier Focus Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, MDDAX returned 11.93%/yr vs 9.95%/yr for AUXFX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MDDAX charges 1.12%/yr vs 0.92%/yr for AUXFX.

Performance

MDDAX vs. AUXFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MassMutual Diversified Value Fund (MDDAX) and Auxier Focus Fund (AUXFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDDAX achieves a 9.86% return, which is significantly higher than AUXFX's 6.76% return. Over the past 10 years, MDDAX has outperformed AUXFX with an annualized return of 11.93%, while AUXFX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.95% annualized return.

MDDAX

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: 3.75%
• YTD: 9.86%
• 6M: 10.88%
• 1Y: 25.16%
• 3Y*: 18.38%
• 5Y*: 10.52%
• 10Y*: 11.93%

AUXFX

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 0.99%
• YTD: 6.76%
• 6M: 8.10%
• 1Y: 16.79%
• 3Y*: 13.62%
• 5Y*: 8.56%
• 10Y*: 9.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDDAX vs. AUXFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MDDAX MassMutual Diversified Value Fund	9.86%	16.56%	16.62%	8.97%	-2.70%	28.07%	-1.14%	32.34%	-8.88%	15.88%
AUXFX Auxier Focus Fund	6.76%	15.23%	11.31%	9.76%	-4.52%	20.03%	6.04%	20.20%	-4.13%	17.75%

Correlation

The correlation between MDDAX and AUXFX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2004	0.93

The correlation between MDDAX and AUXFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.93 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MDDAX vs. AUXFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDDAX

MDDAX Risk / Return Rank: 70
MDDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
MDDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
MDDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 58
MDDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
MDDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

AUXFX

AUXFX Risk / Return Rank: 51
AUXFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
AUXFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
AUXFX Omega Ratio Rank: 42
AUXFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
AUXFX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDDAX vs. AUXFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MassMutual Diversified Value Fund (MDDAX) and Auxier Focus Fund (AUXFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MDDAX	AUXFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.42	1.98	+0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.52	2.90	+0.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.35	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.73	3.13	+0.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.27	11.37	+1.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MDDAX vs. AUXFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDDAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the AUXFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDDAX and AUXFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MDDAX	AUXFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.42	1.98	+0.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62	0.71	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64	0.66	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.58	-0.16

Drawdowns

MDDAX vs. AUXFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDDAX drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, which is greater than AUXFX's maximum drawdown of -39.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDDAX and AUXFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MDDAX	AUXFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.45%	-39.82%	-23.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.99%	-5.42%	-1.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.14%	-9.30%	-4.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.00%	-15.73%	-8.27%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.72%	-33.69%	-5.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.98%	+1.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.17%	-4.42%	-6.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.96%	1.49%	+0.47%

Volatility

MDDAX vs. AUXFX - Volatility Comparison

MassMutual Diversified Value Fund (MDDAX) has a higher volatility of 2.85% compared to Auxier Focus Fund (AUXFX) at 2.27%. This indicates that MDDAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUXFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MDDAX	AUXFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.85%	2.27%	+0.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.89%	6.15%	+1.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.77%	8.57%	+2.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.95%	12.17%	+4.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.72%	15.19%	+3.53%

MDDAX vs. AUXFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDDAX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than AUXFX's 0.92% expense ratio.

Dividends

MDDAX vs. AUXFX - Dividend Comparison

MDDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.53%, more than AUXFX's 2.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AUXFX Auxier Focus Fund	2.66%	2.84%	3.41%	4.38%	3.02%	2.49%	2.36%	6.03%	6.82%	5.52%	2.77%	5.76%
MDDAX MassMutual Diversified Value Fund	29.53%	32.44%	40.33%	4.62%	12.85%	12.66%	1.64%	11.68%	18.94%	37.06%	5.94%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MDDAX and AUXFX in my portfolio?

MDDAX and AUXFX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MDDAX or AUXFX?

MDDAX has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to AUXFX (2.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDDAX dropped -63.45% vs AUXFX's -39.82%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MDDAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.