MDBX vs. NUG

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

MDBX (Tradr 2X Long MDB Daily ETF) and NUG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MDBX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NUG.

Performance

MDBX vs. NUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long MDB Daily ETF (MDBX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NU Daily ETF (NUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MDBX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NUG

• 1D: -2.28%
• 1M: -6.77%
• YTD: -52.17%
• 6M: -52.50%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDBX vs. NUG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MDBX Tradr 2X Long MDB Daily ETF	-74.57%	34.93%
NUG Leverage Shares 2X Long NU Daily ETF	-52.17%	9.30%

Correlation

The correlation between MDBX and NUG is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025	0.16

Return for Risk

MDBX vs. NUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long MDB Daily ETF (MDBX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NU Daily ETF (NUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	MDBX	NUG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-66.15%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-61.30%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-32.18%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MDBX	NUG	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	79.50%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	79.50%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	79.50%	—

MDBX vs. NUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDBX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than NUG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

MDBX vs. NUG - Dividend Comparison

Neither MDBX nor NUG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MDBX and NUG in my portfolio?

MDBX and NUG have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MDBX or NUG?

On fees, NUG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MDBX or NUG?

NUG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for MDBX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MDBX or NUG?

MDBX and NUG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between MDBX and NUG?

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for MDBX and 0.75% for NUG.