MDBU.L vs. TR3G.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MDBU.L (UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and TR3G.L (Invesco US Treasury Bond 1-3 Year UCITS ETF Dist) are both Government Bonds funds - MDBU.L tracks the Solactive Global Multilateral Development Bank Bond USD 25% Issuer Capped Index while TR3G.L tracks the Bloomberg US 1-3 Year Treasury Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MDBU.L returned 2.03%/yr vs 2.93%/yr for TR3G.L. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MDBU.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for TR3G.L.

Performance

MDBU.L vs. TR3G.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (MDBU.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 1-3 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TR3G.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDBU.L achieves a 0.13% return, which is significantly lower than TR3G.L's 0.69% return.

MDBU.L

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 0.98%
• YTD: 0.13%
• 6M: -0.22%
• 1Y: 4.43%
• 3Y*: 1.21%
• 5Y*: 2.03%
• 10Y*: —

TR3G.L

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 1.13%
• YTD: 0.69%
• 6M: 0.31%
• 1Y: 4.42%
• 3Y*: 1.51%
• 5Y*: 2.93%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDBU.L vs. TR3G.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
MDBU.L UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	0.13%	-0.80%	4.66%	-1.28%	3.51%	-0.35%	1.30%	1.13%
TR3G.L Invesco US Treasury Bond 1-3 Year UCITS ETF Dist	0.69%	-1.98%	5.82%	-1.57%	7.69%	0.63%	-0.33%	1.14%

Correlation

The correlation between MDBU.L and TR3G.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2019	0.88

The correlation between MDBU.L and TR3G.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MDBU.L vs. TR3G.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDBU.L

MDBU.L Risk / Return Rank: 21
MDBU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
MDBU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
MDBU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 21
MDBU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
MDBU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 20

TR3G.L

TR3G.L Risk / Return Rank: 21
TR3G.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
TR3G.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
TR3G.L Omega Ratio Rank: 20
TR3G.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
TR3G.L Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDBU.L vs. TR3G.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (MDBU.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 1-3 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TR3G.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MDBU.L	TR3G.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.73	0.73	+0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.13	1.10	+0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.13	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.94	0.98	-0.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.30	2.48	-0.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MDBU.L vs. TR3G.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDBU.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is comparable to the TR3G.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDBU.L and TR3G.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MDBU.L	TR3G.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73	0.73	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24	0.36	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.13	0.18	-0.05

Drawdowns

MDBU.L vs. TR3G.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDBU.L drawdown since its inception was -18.04%, roughly equal to the maximum TR3G.L drawdown of -18.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDBU.L and TR3G.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	MDBU.L	TR3G.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.04%	-18.79%	+0.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.76%	-4.52%	-0.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.99%	-8.90%	+0.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.15%	-16.36%	+0.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.05%	-7.63%	-1.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.90%	-9.79%	-1.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.93%	1.78%	+0.15%

Volatility

MDBU.L vs. TR3G.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (MDBU.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 1-3 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TR3G.L) have volatilities of 1.66% and 1.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MDBU.L	TR3G.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.66%	1.70%	-0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.44%	4.44%	0.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.06%	6.07%	-0.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.41%	8.07%	+0.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.23%	8.64%	+0.59%

MDBU.L vs. TR3G.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDBU.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than TR3G.L's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

MDBU.L vs. TR3G.L - Dividend Comparison

MDBU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, less than TR3G.L's 3.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
MDBU.L UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	3.14%	3.96%	2.14%	1.92%	0.75%	0.74%	1.73%	1.66%
TR3G.L Invesco US Treasury Bond 1-3 Year UCITS ETF Dist	3.95%	4.10%	4.31%	4.18%	1.99%	0.31%	1.28%	2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MDBU.L and TR3G.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, MDBU.L and TR3G.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, MDBU.L or TR3G.L?

On fees, TR3G.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MDBU.L or TR3G.L?

TR3G.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for MDBU.L.

What is the main difference between MDBU.L and TR3G.L?

MDBU.L tracks Solactive Global Multilateral Development Bank Bond USD 25% Issuer Capped Index, while TR3G.L tracks Bloomberg US 1-3 Year Treasury Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for MDBU.L and 0.06% for TR3G.L.