PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDBU.DE vs. VX6F.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDBU.DE vs. VX6F.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (MDBU.DE) and Vanguard U.K. Gilt UCITS ETF GBP Accumulation (VX6F.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDBU.DE achieves a 1.02% return, which is significantly higher than VX6F.DE's -0.49% return.


MDBU.DE

1D
0.09%
1M
0.78%
YTD
1.02%
6M
0.39%
1Y
1.13%
3Y*
0.83%
5Y*
1.69%
10Y*

VX6F.DE

1D
0.16%
1M
1.29%
YTD
-0.49%
6M
-0.45%
1Y
-0.62%
3Y*
2.12%
5Y*
-2.47%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDBU.DE vs. VX6F.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MDBU.DE
UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
1.02%-5.52%8.42%0.69%-1.90%6.58%-4.66%5.56%
VX6F.DE
Vanguard U.K. Gilt UCITS ETF GBP Accumulation
-0.49%0.53%-0.19%18.92%-26.90%-5.30%9.59%5.30%

Correlation

The correlation between MDBU.DE and VX6F.DE is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2019

0.17

The correlation between MDBU.DE and VX6F.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDBU.DE vs. VX6F.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDBU.DE
MDBU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
MDBU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDBU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDBU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
MDBU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDBU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

VX6F.DE
VX6F.DE Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
VX6F.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VX6F.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
VX6F.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
VX6F.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
VX6F.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDBU.DE vs. VX6F.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (MDBU.DE) and Vanguard U.K. Gilt UCITS ETF GBP Accumulation (VX6F.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MDBU.DEVX6F.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

0.99

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.30

-0.12

+0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.72

-0.27

+0.98

MDBU.DE vs. VX6F.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDBU.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is higher than the VX6F.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDBU.DE and VX6F.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDBU.DEVX6F.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

-0.08

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

-0.19

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

-0.06

+0.28

Drawdowns

MDBU.DE vs. VX6F.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDBU.DE drawdown since its inception was -12.38%, smaller than the maximum VX6F.DE drawdown of -38.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDBU.DE and VX6F.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDBU.DEVX6F.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.38%

-38.93%

+26.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.81%

-5.35%

+1.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.06%

-9.02%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.09%

-36.83%

+24.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.60%

-19.85%

+13.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.71%

-14.82%

+9.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.57%

2.34%

-0.77%

Volatility

MDBU.DE vs. VX6F.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (MDBU.DE) is 0.90%, while Vanguard U.K. Gilt UCITS ETF GBP Accumulation (VX6F.DE) has a volatility of 3.41%. This indicates that MDBU.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VX6F.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDBU.DEVX6F.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.90%

3.41%

-2.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.83%

6.21%

-2.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.40%

8.03%

-2.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.21%

12.92%

-5.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.88%

12.09%

-5.21%

MDBU.DE vs. VX6F.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDBU.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VX6F.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MDBU.DE vs. VX6F.DE - Dividend Comparison

MDBU.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, while VX6F.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
MDBU.DE
UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
2.66%3.79%1.92%1.75%0.75%0.59%1.58%1.40%
VX6F.DE
Vanguard U.K. Gilt UCITS ETF GBP Accumulation
0.00%0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDBU.DE and VX6F.DE have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VX6F.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VX6F.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for MDBU.DE.

MDBU.DE tracks Solactive Global Multilateral Development Bank Bond USD 25% Issuer Capped Index, while VX6F.DE tracks Bloomberg Sterling Gilt Float Adjusted Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for MDBU.DE and 0.05% for VX6F.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDBU.DE and VX6F.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer