PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDBA.DE vs. VX6F.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDBA.DE vs. VX6F.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (MDBA.DE) and Vanguard U.K. Gilt UCITS ETF GBP Accumulation (VX6F.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDBA.DE achieves a 1.20% return, which is significantly higher than VX6F.DE's -0.49% return.


MDBA.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.73%
YTD
1.20%
6M
0.67%
1Y
1.63%
3Y*
1.12%
5Y*
1.90%
10Y*

VX6F.DE

1D
0.16%
1M
1.29%
YTD
-0.49%
6M
-0.45%
1Y
-0.62%
3Y*
2.12%
5Y*
-2.47%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDBA.DE vs. VX6F.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MDBA.DE
UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc
1.20%-5.19%8.65%0.89%-1.84%6.67%-4.47%5.75%
VX6F.DE
Vanguard U.K. Gilt UCITS ETF GBP Accumulation
-0.49%0.53%-0.19%18.92%-26.90%-5.30%9.59%5.30%

Correlation

The correlation between MDBA.DE and VX6F.DE is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2019

0.18

The correlation between MDBA.DE and VX6F.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDBA.DE vs. VX6F.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDBA.DE
MDBA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
MDBA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDBA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDBA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
MDBA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDBA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

VX6F.DE
VX6F.DE Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
VX6F.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VX6F.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
VX6F.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
VX6F.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
VX6F.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDBA.DE vs. VX6F.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (MDBA.DE) and Vanguard U.K. Gilt UCITS ETF GBP Accumulation (VX6F.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MDBA.DEVX6F.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

0.99

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.43

-0.12

+0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.04

-0.27

+1.31

MDBA.DE vs. VX6F.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDBA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is higher than the VX6F.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDBA.DE and VX6F.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDBA.DEVX6F.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

-0.08

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

-0.19

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

-0.06

+0.30

Drawdowns

MDBA.DE vs. VX6F.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDBA.DE drawdown since its inception was -12.17%, smaller than the maximum VX6F.DE drawdown of -38.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDBA.DE and VX6F.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDBA.DEVX6F.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.17%

-38.93%

+26.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.81%

-5.35%

+1.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.11%

-9.02%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.02%

-36.83%

+24.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.13%

-19.85%

+13.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.56%

-14.82%

+9.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

2.34%

-0.79%

Volatility

MDBA.DE vs. VX6F.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (MDBA.DE) is 0.85%, while Vanguard U.K. Gilt UCITS ETF GBP Accumulation (VX6F.DE) has a volatility of 3.41%. This indicates that MDBA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VX6F.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDBA.DEVX6F.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.85%

3.41%

-2.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.65%

6.21%

-2.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.31%

8.03%

-2.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.26%

12.92%

-5.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.03%

12.09%

-5.06%

MDBA.DE vs. VX6F.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDBA.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VX6F.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MDBA.DE vs. VX6F.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither MDBA.DE nor VX6F.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


MDBA.DE and VX6F.DE have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VX6F.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VX6F.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MDBA.DE.

MDBA.DE tracks Solactive UBS Global Multilateral Development Bank Bond USD 25% Issuer Capped, while VX6F.DE tracks Bloomberg Sterling Gilt Float Adjusted Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MDBA.DE and 0.05% for VX6F.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDBA.DE and VX6F.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer