PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDBA.DE vs. VAGT.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDBA.DE vs. VAGT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (MDBA.DE) and Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VAGT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDBA.DE achieves a 1.20% return, which is significantly higher than VAGT.DE's 1.07% return.


MDBA.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.73%
YTD
1.20%
6M
0.67%
1Y
1.63%
3Y*
1.12%
5Y*
1.90%
10Y*

VAGT.DE

1D
0.09%
1M
0.83%
YTD
1.07%
6M
0.30%
1Y
1.62%
3Y*
0.08%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDBA.DE vs. VAGT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
MDBA.DE
UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc
1.20%-5.19%8.65%0.23%
VAGT.DE
Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating
1.07%-5.48%6.40%-0.45%

Correlation

The correlation between MDBA.DE and VAGT.DE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2023

0.91

The correlation between MDBA.DE and VAGT.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDBA.DE vs. VAGT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDBA.DE
MDBA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
MDBA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDBA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDBA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
MDBA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDBA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

VAGT.DE
VAGT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
VAGT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAGT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAGT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
VAGT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAGT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDBA.DE vs. VAGT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (MDBA.DE) and Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VAGT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MDBA.DEVAGT.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.05

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.43

0.40

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.04

1.00

+0.04

MDBA.DE vs. VAGT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDBA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is comparable to the VAGT.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDBA.DE and VAGT.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDBA.DEVAGT.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

0.29

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.05

+0.19

Drawdowns

MDBA.DE vs. VAGT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDBA.DE drawdown since its inception was -12.17%, which is greater than VAGT.DE's maximum drawdown of -11.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDBA.DE and VAGT.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDBA.DEVAGT.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.17%

-11.03%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.81%

-4.00%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.11%

-11.03%

+0.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.13%

-7.21%

+1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.56%

-5.04%

-0.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

1.61%

-0.06%

Volatility

MDBA.DE vs. VAGT.DE - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (MDBA.DE) and Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VAGT.DE) have volatilities of 0.85% and 0.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDBA.DEVAGT.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.85%

0.86%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.65%

3.76%

-0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.31%

5.49%

-0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.26%

7.33%

-0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.03%

7.33%

-0.30%

MDBA.DE vs. VAGT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDBA.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VAGT.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MDBA.DE vs. VAGT.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither MDBA.DE nor VAGT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, MDBA.DE and VAGT.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, VAGT.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VAGT.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MDBA.DE.

MDBA.DE tracks Solactive UBS Global Multilateral Development Bank Bond USD 25% Issuer Capped, while VAGT.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate US Treasury Float Adjusted Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MDBA.DE and 0.05% for VAGT.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDBA.DE and VAGT.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer