MDBA.DE vs. QDVP.DE
MDBA.DE (UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc) and QDVP.DE (iShares US Mortgage Backed Securities UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MDBA.DE is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Solactive UBS Global Multilateral Development Bank Bond USD 25% Issuer Capped, while QDVP.DE is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund tracking the Bloomberg US Mortgage Backed Securities Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MDBA.DE returned 1.90%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for QDVP.DE. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MDBA.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for QDVP.DE.
Performance
MDBA.DE vs. QDVP.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDBA.DE achieves a 1.20% return, which is significantly lower than QDVP.DE's 1.51% return.
MDBA.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 1.20%
- 6M
- 0.67%
- 1Y
- 1.63%
- 3Y*
- 1.12%
- 5Y*
- 1.90%
- 10Y*
- —
QDVP.DE
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 1.51%
- 6M
- 1.20%
- 1Y
- 4.26%
- 3Y*
- 1.34%
- 5Y*
- 1.05%
- 10Y*
- 0.86%
MDBA.DE vs. QDVP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDBA.DE UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc | 1.20% | -5.19% | 8.65% | 0.89% | -1.84% | 6.67% | -4.47% | 7.64% | 0.37% |
QDVP.DE iShares US Mortgage Backed Securities UCITS ETF | 1.51% | -3.56% | 7.02% | 0.27% | -6.06% | 6.72% | -5.61% | 9.05% | 1.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDBA.DE and QDVP.DE is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2018 | 0.82 |
The correlation between MDBA.DE and QDVP.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDBA.DE vs. QDVP.DE — Risk / Return Rank
MDBA.DE
QDVP.DE
MDBA.DE vs. QDVP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (MDBA.DE) and iShares US Mortgage Backed Securities UCITS ETF (QDVP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MDBA.DE | QDVP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.14 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | 1.23 | -0.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.04 | 3.10 | -2.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MDBA.DE | QDVP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 | 0.75 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.13 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.09 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
MDBA.DE vs. QDVP.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDBA.DE drawdown since its inception was -12.17%, smaller than the maximum QDVP.DE drawdown of -16.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDBA.DE and QDVP.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDBA.DE | QDVP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.17% | -16.57% | +4.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.81% | -3.46% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.11% | -11.15% | +1.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.02% | -14.91% | +2.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -16.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.13% | -7.63% | +1.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.56% | -7.72% | +2.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.55% | 1.37% | +0.18% |
Volatility
MDBA.DE vs. QDVP.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (MDBA.DE) is 0.85%, while iShares US Mortgage Backed Securities UCITS ETF (QDVP.DE) has a volatility of 0.92%. This indicates that MDBA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDVP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDBA.DE | QDVP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.85% | 0.92% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.65% | 4.07% | -0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.31% | 5.62% | -0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.26% | 8.15% | -0.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.03% | 7.56% | -0.53% |
MDBA.DE vs. QDVP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDBA.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QDVP.DE's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
MDBA.DE vs. QDVP.DE - Dividend Comparison
MDBA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QDVP.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDBA.DE UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QDVP.DE iShares US Mortgage Backed Securities UCITS ETF | 3.58% | 3.63% | 3.51% | 3.27% | 2.45% | 2.19% | 2.69% | 2.99% | 3.03% | 3.04% | 1.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MDBA.DE and QDVP.DE have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MDBA.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MDBA.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for QDVP.DE.
MDBA.DE is categorized as Government Bonds, while QDVP.DE is Mortgage Backed Securities. MDBA.DE tracks Solactive UBS Global Multilateral Development Bank Bond USD 25% Issuer Capped, while QDVP.DE tracks Bloomberg US Mortgage Backed Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MDBA.DE and 0.28% for QDVP.DE.
Find the right allocation for MDBA.DE and QDVP.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer