MDBA.DE vs. PR1S.DE
MDBA.DE (UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc) and PR1S.DE (Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF DR (D)) are both Government Bonds funds - MDBA.DE tracks the Solactive UBS Global Multilateral Development Bank Bond USD 25% Issuer Capped while PR1S.DE tracks the Solactive US Treasury Bond. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MDBA.DE returned 1.90%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for PR1S.DE. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MDBA.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for PR1S.DE.
Performance
MDBA.DE vs. PR1S.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDBA.DE achieves a 1.20% return, which is significantly higher than PR1S.DE's 1.04% return.
MDBA.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 1.20%
- 6M
- 0.67%
- 1Y
- 1.63%
- 3Y*
- 1.12%
- 5Y*
- 1.90%
- 10Y*
- —
PR1S.DE
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.83%
- YTD
- 1.04%
- 6M
- 0.32%
- 1Y
- 1.64%
- 3Y*
- 0.10%
- 5Y*
- 0.57%
- 10Y*
- —
MDBA.DE vs. PR1S.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDBA.DE UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc | 1.20% | -5.19% | 8.65% | 0.89% | -1.84% | 6.67% | -4.47% | 6.63% |
PR1S.DE Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF DR (D) | 1.04% | -5.53% | 6.59% | 0.45% | -6.79% | 5.94% | -1.86% | -4.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDBA.DE and PR1S.DE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2019 | 0.81 |
The correlation between MDBA.DE and PR1S.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (all time) to 0.94 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDBA.DE vs. PR1S.DE — Risk / Return Rank
MDBA.DE
PR1S.DE
MDBA.DE vs. PR1S.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (MDBA.DE) and Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1S.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MDBA.DE | PR1S.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.05 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | 0.40 | +0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.04 | 1.01 | +0.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MDBA.DE | PR1S.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 | 0.30 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.07 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | -0.09 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
MDBA.DE vs. PR1S.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDBA.DE drawdown since its inception was -12.17%, smaller than the maximum PR1S.DE drawdown of -17.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDBA.DE and PR1S.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDBA.DE | PR1S.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.17% | -17.15% | +4.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.81% | -4.05% | +0.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.11% | -11.04% | +0.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.02% | -12.84% | +0.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.13% | -12.54% | +6.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.56% | -10.33% | +4.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.55% | 1.62% | -0.07% |
Volatility
MDBA.DE vs. PR1S.DE - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (MDBA.DE) and Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1S.DE) have volatilities of 0.85% and 0.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDBA.DE | PR1S.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.85% | 0.86% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.65% | 3.80% | -0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.31% | 5.49% | -0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.26% | 8.02% | -0.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.03% | 8.93% | -1.90% |
MDBA.DE vs. PR1S.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDBA.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than PR1S.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MDBA.DE vs. PR1S.DE - Dividend Comparison
MDBA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PR1S.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDBA.DE UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PR1S.DE Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF DR (D) | 3.19% | 3.22% | 2.83% | 2.36% | 1.91% | 1.73% | 2.14% | 1.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, MDBA.DE and PR1S.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, PR1S.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PR1S.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MDBA.DE.
MDBA.DE tracks Solactive UBS Global Multilateral Development Bank Bond USD 25% Issuer Capped, while PR1S.DE tracks Solactive US Treasury Bond. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MDBA.DE and 0.05% for PR1S.DE.
Find the right allocation for MDBA.DE and PR1S.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer