PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDA.TO vs. CBOE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MDA.TO vs. CBOE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in MDA Space Ltd. (MDA.TO) and Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (CBOE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MDA.TO is traded in CAD, while CBOE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CBOE values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDA.TO achieves a 56.61% return, which is significantly higher than CBOE's 17.40% return.


MDA.TO

1D
-3.80%
1M
-22.27%
6M
13.68%
YTD
56.61%
1Y
2.66%
3Y*
70.89%
5Y*
21.36%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
22.67%

CBOE

1D
0.12%
1M
13.27%
6M
5.93%
YTD
17.40%
1Y
21.36%
3Y*
30.22%
5Y*
23.25%
10Y*
17.66%
ALL TIME*
18.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$410.14MCA$474.18MCA$578.48M
CA$59.55MCA$62.57MCA$66.44M

MDA.TO vs. CBOE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MDA.TO
MDA Space Ltd.
56.61%-9.79%156.34%80.00%-32.63%-32.81%
CBOE
Cboe Global Markets, Inc.
17.40%24.03%20.12%40.93%4.04%34.47%

Correlation

The correlation between MDA.TO and CBOE is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2021

0.01

The correlation between MDA.TO and CBOE shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.02 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MDA.TO:

CA$5.79B

CBOE:

$29.83B

EPS

MDA.TO:

CA$0.81

CBOE:

$11.77

PE Ratio

MDA.TO:

51.44

CBOE:

24.23

PEG Ratio

MDA.TO:

0.21

CBOE:

0.45

PS Ratio

MDA.TO:

3.10

CBOE:

6.24

PB Ratio

MDA.TO:

3.00

CBOE:

5.57

Total Revenue (TTM)

MDA.TO:

CA$1.75B

CBOE:

$4.79B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MDA.TO:

CA$366.40M

CBOE:

$2.50B

EBITDA (TTM)

MDA.TO:

CA$291.70M

CBOE:

$1.87B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDA.TO vs. CBOE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDA.TO
MDA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
MDA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
MDA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

CBOE
CBOE Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
CBOE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBOE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBOE Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
CBOE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBOE Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDA.TO vs. CBOE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MDA Space Ltd. (MDA.TO) and Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (CBOE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MDA.TOCBOEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.15

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.05

0.62

-0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.10

2.07

-1.97

MDA.TO vs. CBOE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDA.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.04, which is lower than the CBOE Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDA.TO and CBOE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MDA.TO vs. CBOE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDA.TO drawdown since its inception was -68.33%, which is greater than CBOE's maximum drawdown of -39.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDA.TO and CBOE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDA.TOCBOEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.33%

-39.92%

-28.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.77%

-34.69%

-19.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.77%

-34.69%

-19.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-65.68%

-34.69%

-30.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.85%

-20.13%

-17.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.50%

-11.00%

-19.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.48%

10.33%

+16.15%

Volatility

MDA.TO vs. CBOE - Volatility Comparison

MDA Space Ltd. (MDA.TO) has a higher volatility of 21.85% compared to Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (CBOE) at 10.86%. This indicates that MDA.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBOE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDA.TOCBOEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.85%

10.86%

+10.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.45%

28.56%

+19.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.50%

31.59%

+36.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.25%

24.97%

+25.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.04%

26.58%

+23.46%

Dividends

MDA.TO vs. CBOE - Dividend Comparison

MDA.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBOE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBOE
Cboe Global Markets, Inc.
1.01%1.08%1.21%1.18%1.56%1.38%1.68%1.12%1.19%0.83%1.30%1.36%
MDA.TO
MDA Space Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MDA.TO vs. CBOE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MDA Space Ltd. and Cboe Global Markets, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
464.10M
1.27B
(MDA.TO) Total Revenue
(CBOE) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. MDA.TO values in CAD, CBOE values in USD

MDA.TO vs. CBOE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between MDA Space Ltd. and Cboe Global Markets, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
18.1%
52.6%
Portfolio components
MDA.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, MDA Space Ltd. reported a gross profit of 84.00M and revenue of 464.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.1%.

CBOE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cboe Global Markets, Inc. reported a gross profit of 669.90M and revenue of 1.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.6%.

MDA.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, MDA Space Ltd. reported an operating income of 32.30M and revenue of 464.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.0%.

CBOE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cboe Global Markets, Inc. reported an operating income of 505.60M and revenue of 1.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 39.7%.

MDA.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, MDA Space Ltd. reported a net income of 29.60M and revenue of 464.10M, resulting in a net margin of 6.4%.

CBOE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cboe Global Markets, Inc. reported a net income of 385.70M and revenue of 1.27B, resulting in a net margin of 30.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MDA.TO and CBOE have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDA.TO and CBOE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer