PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCSRX vs. MITTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MCSRX vs. MITTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSRX) and MFS Massachusetts Investors Trust (MITTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCSRX achieves a 19.67% return, which is significantly higher than MITTX's 8.24% return. Over the past 10 years, MCSRX has underperformed MITTX with an annualized return of 7.43%, while MITTX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.25% annualized return.


MCSRX

1D
-0.23%
1M
6.14%
6M
9.09%
YTD
19.67%
1Y
34.01%
3Y*
12.94%
5Y*
10.36%
10Y*
7.43%
ALL TIME*
1.76%

MITTX

1D
1.66%
1M
1.10%
6M
5.46%
YTD
8.24%
1Y
15.92%
3Y*
15.27%
5Y*
9.15%
10Y*
13.25%
ALL TIME*
7.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MCSRX vs. MITTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MCSRX
MFS Commodity Strategy Fund
19.67%18.63%5.18%-6.07%13.19%27.96%-0.36%7.80%-12.77%3.83%
MITTX
MFS Massachusetts Investors Trust
8.24%13.67%19.69%19.26%-16.27%26.73%18.72%31.92%-5.56%23.55%

Correlation

The correlation between MCSRX and MITTX is 0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

0.19

The correlation between MCSRX and MITTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MCSRX vs. MITTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MCSRX
MCSRX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
MCSRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCSRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCSRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
MCSRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCSRX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

MITTX
MITTX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
MITTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MITTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
MITTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
MITTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
MITTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MCSRX vs. MITTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSRX) and MFS Massachusetts Investors Trust (MITTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MCSRXMITTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.21

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

1.44

+1.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.80

6.05

+1.75

MCSRX vs. MITTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCSRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is higher than the MITTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCSRX and MITTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MCSRX vs. MITTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCSRX drawdown since its inception was -72.07%, which is greater than MITTX's maximum drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCSRX and MITTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MCSRXMITTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.07%

-49.54%

-22.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.50%

-9.76%

-2.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.50%

-16.10%

+3.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.76%

-23.27%

-14.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.07%

-33.45%

-38.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.97%

-1.11%

-19.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.62%

-10.51%

-31.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.00%

2.32%

+1.68%

Volatility

MCSRX vs. MITTX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSRX) has a higher volatility of 4.35% compared to MFS Massachusetts Investors Trust (MITTX) at 3.18%. This indicates that MCSRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MITTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MCSRXMITTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.35%

3.18%

+1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.08%

9.44%

+3.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.33%

12.09%

+4.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.75%

15.79%

+18.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.89%

17.18%

+42.71%

MCSRX vs. MITTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCSRX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than MITTX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

MCSRX vs. MITTX - Dividend Comparison

MCSRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.52%, more than MITTX's 11.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MCSRX
MFS Commodity Strategy Fund
13.52%16.18%3.39%2.30%27.57%56.15%0.91%1.88%3.50%3.13%0.61%0.47%
MITTX
MFS Massachusetts Investors Trust
11.01%14.33%14.47%10.96%9.35%8.66%8.14%7.58%13.49%7.27%5.55%6.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


MCSRX and MITTX have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MCSRX has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to MITTX (3.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCSRX dropped -72.07% vs MITTX's -49.54%.

MCSRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MCSRX and MITTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer