MCSRX vs. FIFGX
MCSRX (MFS Commodity Strategy Fund) and FIFGX (Fidelity SAI Inflation-Focused) are both Commodities funds. Over the past 5 years, MCSRX returned 11.89%/yr vs 11.70%/yr for FIFGX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MCSRX charges 0.82%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FIFGX.
Performance
MCSRX vs. FIFGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCSRX achieves a 24.65% return, which is significantly lower than FIFGX's 45.44% return.
MCSRX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -2.17%
- YTD
- 24.65%
- 6M
- 25.24%
- 1Y
- 39.60%
- 3Y*
- 17.31%
- 5Y*
- 11.89%
- 10Y*
- 7.43%
FIFGX
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -3.56%
- YTD
- 45.44%
- 6M
- 41.16%
- 1Y
- 54.21%
- 3Y*
- 17.52%
- 5Y*
- 11.70%
- 10Y*
- —
MCSRX vs. FIFGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCSRX MFS Commodity Strategy Fund | 24.65% | 18.63% | 5.18% | -6.07% | 13.19% | 27.96% | -0.36% | 7.80% | -1.94% |
FIFGX Fidelity SAI Inflation-Focused | 45.44% | 7.44% | 6.34% | -11.90% | 9.30% | 32.92% | 1.48% | 9.32% | -2.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between MCSRX and FIFGX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2018 | 0.89 |
The correlation between MCSRX and FIFGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MCSRX vs. FIFGX — Risk / Return Rank
MCSRX
FIFGX
MCSRX vs. FIFGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSRX) and Fidelity SAI Inflation-Focused (FIFGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MCSRX | FIFGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.44 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.91 | 7.35 | -2.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.12 | 15.66 | +0.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MCSRX | FIFGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.54 | 2.56 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.03 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
MCSRX vs. FIFGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCSRX drawdown since its inception was -72.07%, smaller than the maximum FIFGX drawdown of -92.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCSRX and FIFGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCSRX | FIFGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.07% | -92.38% | +20.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.17% | -7.52% | -0.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.77% | -90.27% | +80.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.76% | -92.38% | +54.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.68% | -4.73% | -12.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.86% | -13.91% | -27.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | 3.52% | -1.03% |
Volatility
MCSRX vs. FIFGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSRX) is 4.90%, while Fidelity SAI Inflation-Focused (FIFGX) has a volatility of 7.22%. This indicates that MCSRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIFGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MCSRX | FIFGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.90% | 7.22% | -2.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.72% | 18.34% | -4.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.91% | 21.78% | -5.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.78% | 408.18% | -373.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.91% | 334.62% | -274.71% |
MCSRX vs. FIFGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MCSRX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than FIFGX's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
MCSRX vs. FIFGX - Dividend Comparison
MCSRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.98%, more than FIFGX's 3.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIFGX Fidelity SAI Inflation-Focused | 3.74% | 5.44% | 4.73% | 2.43% | 12.64% | 35.77% | 3.10% | 1.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MCSRX MFS Commodity Strategy Fund | 12.98% | 16.18% | 3.39% | 2.30% | 27.57% | 56.15% | 0.91% | 1.88% | 3.50% | 3.13% | 0.61% | 0.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MCSRX and FIFGX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FIFGX has higher volatility (7.22%) compared to MCSRX (4.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCSRX dropped -72.07% vs FIFGX's -92.38%.
FIFGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MCSRX and FIFGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer