PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MCSM.TO vs. HXCN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MCSM.TO vs. HXCN.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

MCSM.TO (Manulife Multifactor Canadian SMID Cap Index ETF) and HXCN.TO (Global X S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index Corporate Class ETF) are both Canada Equities funds. MCSM.TO is actively managed, while HXCN.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MCSM.TO returned 11.72%/yr vs 15.27%/yr for HXCN.TO. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MCSM.TO vs. HXCN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Manulife Multifactor Canadian SMID Cap Index ETF (MCSM.TO) and Global X S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index Corporate Class ETF (HXCN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCSM.TO achieves a 11.32% return, which is significantly lower than HXCN.TO's 12.83% return.

MCSM.TO

1D
0.46%
1M
-1.44%
6M
4.24%
YTD
11.32%
1Y
32.76%
3Y*
19.58%
5Y*
11.72%
10Y*
—

HXCN.TO

1D
0.25%
1M
0.37%
6M
8.60%
YTD
12.83%
1Y
33.59%
3Y*
23.69%
5Y*
15.27%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCSM.TO vs. HXCN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MCSM.TO
Manulife Multifactor Canadian SMID Cap Index ETF		11.32%39.56%4.39%6.83%1.07%17.32%9.43%
HXCN.TO
Global X S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index Corporate Class ETF		12.83%31.20%21.60%11.98%-6.07%25.23%1.60%

Correlation

The correlation between MCSM.TO and HXCN.TO is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2020

0.29

Over the past year, MCSM.TO and HXCN.TO have become more correlated (0.60) than their long-term average of 0.29, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Manulife Multifactor Canadian SMID Cap Index ETF

Global X S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index Corporate Class ETF

Often compared with HXCN.TO:
HXCN.TO vs. HXT.TOHXCN.TO vs. XIC.TOHXCN.TO vs. ZCN.TOHXCN.TO vs. HXS.TOHXCN.TO vs. VCN.TOHXCN.TO vs. HXH.TOHXCN.TO vs. XCV.TO

Return for Risk

MCSM.TO vs. HXCN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MCSM.TO
MCSM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
MCSM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCSM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCSM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MCSM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCSM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
HXCN.TO
HXCN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
HXCN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXCN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXCN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
HXCN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXCN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCSM.TO vs. HXCN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manulife Multifactor Canadian SMID Cap Index ETF (MCSM.TO) and Global X S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index Corporate Class ETF (HXCN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

MCSM.TOHXCN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.28
2.59

-1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.70
3.38

-1.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.46

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

3.83

-1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.33

16.49

-11.17

MCSM.TO vs. HXCN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCSM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the HXCN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCSM.TO and HXCN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MCSM.TO vs. HXCN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCSM.TO drawdown since its inception was -42.80%, which is greater than HXCN.TO's maximum drawdown of -37.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCSM.TO and HXCN.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MCSM.TOHXCN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.80%

-37.09%

-5.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.54%

-8.81%

-5.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.65%

-12.49%

-10.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.93%

-16.27%

-6.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.40%

0.00%

-8.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.53%

-4.05%

-2.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.16%

2.04%

+4.12%

Volatility

MCSM.TO vs. HXCN.TO - Volatility Comparison

Manulife Multifactor Canadian SMID Cap Index ETF (MCSM.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.94% compared to Global X S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index Corporate Class ETF (HXCN.TO) at 2.89%. This indicates that MCSM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HXCN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MCSM.TOHXCN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.94%

2.89%

+2.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.07%

10.35%

+6.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.62%

13.03%

+12.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.04%

13.81%

+36.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.71%

17.72%

+31.99%

Dividends

MCSM.TO vs. HXCN.TO - Dividend Comparison

MCSM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, while HXCN.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
HXCN.TO
Global X S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index Corporate Class ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MCSM.TO
Manulife Multifactor Canadian SMID Cap Index ETF		1.78%1.63%1.82%2.15%2.05%1.23%1.05%1.41%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

MCSM.TO and HXCN.TO have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: Manulife and Global X.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MCSM.TO and HXCN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer