PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCSIX vs. MFEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MCSIX vs. MFEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSIX) and MFS Growth I (MFEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCSIX achieves a 15.47% return, which is significantly higher than MFEIX's 3.70% return. Over the past 10 years, MCSIX has underperformed MFEIX with an annualized return of 6.56%, while MFEIX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.81% annualized return.


MCSIX

1D
-0.71%
1M
-7.32%
YTD
15.47%
6M
13.90%
1Y
25.16%
3Y*
13.36%
5Y*
10.41%
10Y*
6.56%

MFEIX

1D
-1.47%
1M
-0.14%
YTD
3.70%
6M
2.62%
1Y
13.33%
3Y*
24.98%
5Y*
12.61%
10Y*
17.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCSIX vs. MFEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MCSIX
MFS Commodity Strategy Fund
15.47%18.47%5.08%-6.13%13.40%27.55%-0.02%7.79%-12.79%3.65%
MFEIX
MFS Growth I
3.70%12.34%49.67%36.15%-31.14%23.59%31.65%37.69%2.30%30.86%

Correlation

The correlation between MCSIX and MFEIX is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2010

0.19

The correlation between MCSIX and MFEIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MCSIX vs. MFEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCSIX
MCSIX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
MCSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
MCSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

MFEIX
MFEIX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
MFEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
MFEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCSIX vs. MFEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSIX) and MFS Growth I (MFEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MCSIXMFEIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.16

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

0.84

+1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.72

2.71

+6.01

MCSIX vs. MFEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is higher than the MFEIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCSIX and MFEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MCSIX vs. MFEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCSIX drawdown since its inception was -64.20%, smaller than the maximum MFEIX drawdown of -72.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCSIX and MFEIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MCSIXMFEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.20%

-72.24%

+8.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.11%

-17.30%

+7.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.11%

-23.24%

+13.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.61%

-36.11%

-1.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.61%

-36.11%

-1.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.11%

-2.77%

-7.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.19%

-23.69%

-9.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

5.37%

-2.48%

Volatility

MCSIX vs. MFEIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSIX) is 3.60%, while MFS Growth I (MFEIX) has a volatility of 6.54%. This indicates that MCSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MCSIXMFEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

6.54%

-2.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.75%

13.39%

+0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.02%

16.83%

-0.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.63%

22.04%

+12.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.03%

21.33%

+4.70%

MCSIX vs. MFEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCSIX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than MFEIX's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

MCSIX vs. MFEIX - Dividend Comparison

MCSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.89%, less than MFEIX's 14.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MCSIX
MFS Commodity Strategy Fund
13.89%16.04%3.30%2.21%27.42%56.01%0.88%1.87%3.50%3.14%0.61%0.47%
MFEIX
MFS Growth I
14.46%14.99%25.47%4.86%1.05%2.76%3.57%1.57%3.78%2.50%1.61%3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


MCSIX and MFEIX have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFEIX has higher volatility (6.54%) compared to MCSIX (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCSIX dropped -64.20% vs MFEIX's -72.24%.

MCSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MCSIX and MFEIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer