MCHS.L vs. CM5S.L
MCHS.L (Invesco MSCI China All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF Acc) and CM5S.L (Invesco S&P China A MidCap 500 Swap UCITS ETF Acc) are both China Equities funds from Invesco - MCHS.L tracks the MSCI China NR USD while CM5S.L tracks the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MCHS.L returned 8.02%/yr vs 19.85%/yr for CM5S.L. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
MCHS.L vs. CM5S.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCHS.L achieves a -1.18% return, which is significantly lower than CM5S.L's 19.25% return.
MCHS.L
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- -1.18%
- 6M
- -1.60%
- 1Y
- 15.62%
- 3Y*
- 8.02%
- 5Y*
- -2.86%
- 10Y*
- —
CM5S.L
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 2.36%
- YTD
- 19.25%
- 6M
- 27.95%
- 1Y
- 71.20%
- 3Y*
- 19.85%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MCHS.L vs. CM5S.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCHS.L Invesco MSCI China All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF Acc | -1.18% | 19.38% | 18.84% | -17.54% | 7.12% |
CM5S.L Invesco S&P China A MidCap 500 Swap UCITS ETF Acc | 19.25% | 42.07% | 14.29% | -14.04% | 13.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between MCHS.L and CM5S.L is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2022 | 0.73 |
The correlation between MCHS.L and CM5S.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MCHS.L vs. CM5S.L — Risk / Return Rank
MCHS.L
CM5S.L
MCHS.L vs. CM5S.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI China All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF Acc (MCHS.L) and Invesco S&P China A MidCap 500 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (CM5S.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MCHS.L | CM5S.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.57 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 5.48 | -4.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.08 | 21.45 | -18.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MCHS.L | CM5S.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 3.49 | -2.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.12 | 0.68 | -0.80 |
Drawdowns
MCHS.L vs. CM5S.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCHS.L drawdown since its inception was -47.34%, which is greater than CM5S.L's maximum drawdown of -38.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCHS.L and CM5S.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCHS.L | CM5S.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.34% | -38.57% | -8.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.03% | -12.93% | +0.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.97% | -26.12% | +1.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.01% | -4.43% | -13.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.06% | -13.46% | -12.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.06% | 3.31% | +1.75% |
Volatility
MCHS.L vs. CM5S.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco MSCI China All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF Acc (MCHS.L) is 5.64%, while Invesco S&P China A MidCap 500 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (CM5S.L) has a volatility of 6.29%. This indicates that MCHS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CM5S.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MCHS.L | CM5S.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.64% | 6.29% | -0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.93% | 15.26% | -4.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.12% | 20.30% | -4.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.74% | 25.03% | +6.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.27% | 25.03% | +6.24% |
MCHS.L vs. CM5S.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MCHS.L and CM5S.L have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
MCHS.L vs. CM5S.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither MCHS.L nor CM5S.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MCHS.L and CM5S.L have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MCHS.L and CM5S.L have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
MCHS.L tracks MSCI China NR USD, while CM5S.L tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY.
Find the right allocation for MCHS.L and CM5S.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer